Cited by 1Education during COVID-19 pandemicDigital Education and SocietyEducation Practices and Challenges

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Other Worlds and Educations Are Possible: Lessons from Teaching and Learning During Covid-19

Open access
Meyer, Neil, Wills, Jocelyn·2022·Radical Teacher

Abstract

Introduction to special issue.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5195/rt.2022.1114

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The equity gap has widened during the pandemic, as previous research suggests.

    “This evidence, in addition to the lower enrollment for Blacks during the pandemic, suggest that not only is there an equity gap, but it has widened as previous research suggests (Anand & Lall, 2022;Meyer & Wills, 2022;Minkos & Gelbar, 2021;Ruef et al., 2022).”

    From COVID-19 Impact on College Algebra (2024) · cites this paper as Meyer & Wills, 2022

  • There has been a lot of research about how the COVID-19 pandemic has widened the equity gap that already existed.

    “Lastly, there has been a lot of research about how the COVID-19 pandemic has widened the equity gap that already existed (Anand & Lall, 2022;Meyer and Wills, 2022;Minkos & Gelbar, 2021;Ruef, Willingham, & Ahearn, 2022).”

    From COVID-19 Impact on College Algebra (2024) · cites this paper as Meyer and Wills, 2022

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. http://radicalteacher.library.pitt.edu No. 124 (Fall 2022) DOI 10.5195/rt.2022.1114 References · DOI
  2. Segrue, Thomas J. and Caitlin Zaloom, eds. The Long Year: A 2020 Reader. New York: Columbia University Press, 2022.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Meyer, N., & Wills, J.
Affiliations
  • LaGuardia Community College (US)
  • Brooklyn College (US)
Venue
Radical Teacher
Published
2022-12-02
Volume
124
Pages
1-5
ISSN
  • 0191-4847 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-0832
OpenAlex
W4311190427
Cited by
1
References
1
Citations by year
2022: 1
FWCI
0.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Radical Teacher (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • The Radical Teacher (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education during COVID-19 pandemic
  • Social Sciences › Education › Digital Education and Society
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education Practices and Challenges
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, teaching-learning process, radical pedagogy, alternative education, social justice education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review