The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Research Ethics in the Real World: Euro-Western and Indigenous perspectives
Abstract
Research Ethics in the Real World highlights the links between research ethics and individual, social, professional, institutional, and political ethics. Helen Kara considers all stages of the research process and provides guidance for quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods researchers about how to act ethically throughout.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Assigning pseudonyms begins from the fieldwork resumed and continues to future publications requiring protecting participants (Clandinin, 2016; Kara, 2018; Lahman, 2024; Lahman et al., 2023).”
From Safeguarding Participants: Using Pseudonyms for Ensuring Confidentiality and Anonymity in Qualitative Research (2025) · cites this paper as Kara, 2018
In the citing paper
“I am aware that using pseudonyms and maintaining anonymity and confidentiality is not limited to data collection; instead, it requires careful attention during data analysis, interpretation, writing, reporting, and finally, disseminating the research findings (Delamont, 2016; Kara, 2018; Subedi, 2024a).”
From Safeguarding Participants: Using Pseudonyms for Ensuring Confidentiality and Anonymity in Qualitative Research (2025) · cites this paper as Kara, 2018
Citations
Cited by
Exploring experiences of ableism in academia: a constructivist inquiry
Brown, N., & Ramlackhan, K. (2022) · Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10734-021-00739-y · Cited by 62
Subedi, K. R. (2025) · KMC Journal · doi:10.3126/kmcj.v7i1.75109 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Kara, H.
- Corresponding author
- Kara, Helen
- ORCID
- Kara, Helen
- Venue
- Policy Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Policy Press
- Published
- 2018-11-14
- OpenAlex
- W4289291446
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 4.89
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Policy Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
- Social Sciences › Education › Academic integrity and plagiarism
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Data Analysis and Archiving
- Keywords
- research ethics, professional ethics, institutional ethics, social ethics, political ethics, research stages, quantitative research, qualitative research, mixed methods, ethical conduct of research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
