Cited by 377Higher Education Research StudiesHigher Education Practises and EngagementEducation and Military Integration

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Transition pedagogy: A third generation approach to FYE - A case study of policy and practice for the higher education sector

Open access
Kift, Sally, Nelson, Karen, Clarke, John·2010·The International Journal of the First Year in Higher Education

Abstract

Current research and practice related to the first year experience (FYE) of commencing higher education students are still mainly piecemeal rather than institution-wide with institutions struggling to achieve cross-institutional integration, coordination and coherence of FYE policy and practice.Drawing on a decade of FYE-related research including an ALTC Senior Fellowship and evidence at a large Australian metropolitan university, this paper explores how one institution has addressed that issue by tracing the evolution and maturation of strategies that ultimately conceptualize FYE as "everybody's business."It is argued that, when first generation co-curricular and second generation curricular approaches are integrated and implemented through an intentionally designed curriculum by seamless partnerships of academic and professional staff in a whole-of-institution transformation, we have a third generation approach labelled here as transition pedagogy.It is suggested that transition pedagogy provides the optimal vehicle for dealing with the increasingly diverse commencing student cohorts by facilitating a sense of engagement, support and belonging.What is presented here is an example of transition pedagogy in action.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5204/intjfyhe.v1i1.13

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 377

Metadata

Authors
Kift, S., Nelson, K., & Clarke, J.
Affiliations
Queensland University of Technology (AU)
Venue
The International Journal of the First Year in Higher Education
Published
2010-07-21
Volume
1
Issue
1
ISSN
1838-2959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1988629989
Cited by
377
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 42 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 16
FWCI
92.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Student Success (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • University of Southern Queensland ePrints (University of Southern Queensland) (acceptedVersion)
  • QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • USC Research Bank (University of the Sunshine Coast) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Practises and Engagement
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education and Military Integration
Keywords
transition pedagogy, first-year experience, transition to higher education, first-generation college students, second-generation students, extracurricular activities, curriculum development, student engagement, school belonging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review