Minería y movilizaciones sociales en Colombia: consultas populares y derecho al territorio
Open accessAbstract
A look at the agenda of social mobilization in Colombia in the last ten years shows that the main issues of social conflict are linked to the struggles against the impact of the so-called locomotives of development, within the framework of historical mobilizations to the right to protest and for the access, coverage and quality of social services. It is an emerging and growing mobilization against the prevalent liberal and extractivist economic model and the questioned state response to social conflicts. This article addresses actors and agendas of the mobilizations against the "miningenergy locomotive" and in defense of the territory and explores the learning and expectations of the communities in rural and urban contexts that resist economic measures and claim the right to territory and a dignified life. Without ignoring the connections with the Latin American dynamics, the peculiarities of the Colombian case are highlighted, in relation to the challenges of a citizenship that rises over territorialized cultural and political aspects, that explores the path of institutional ways, such as popular consultations, projecting them as forms of contestatory action beyond non-legal resources, in the framework of organizational processes of subaltern sectors that invoke the participatory democracy enshrined in the 1991 Political Charter.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Cruz, E. (2014): “Dignidad en movimiento. El ascenso de la movilidad social en Colombia (2010-2014), CONFLUENZE, 6 (2), pp. 241-275. Università di Bologna.
- Restrepo, A. y M. C. García (2013): “Paz ¿Y agenda social?”, Cien Días, CINEP/PPP, 77, pp. 58-62.
- Svampa, M. (2013): “Consenso de los Commodities y lenguajes de valoración en América Latina”, Nueva Sociedad, 244, pp. 30-46. Disponible en: http://www.unesco.org.uy/shs/red-bioetica/fileadmin/shs/redbioetica/ Consenso_de_Commodities.pdf
- Garcés Villamil, M. A. y W. Rapalino Bautista (2015): “La Consulta Popular como mecanismo de participación ciudadana para evitar actividades mineras”, Justicia Juris11 (1), pp. 52-62, URL: http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/jusju/v11n1/v11n1a05.pdf
- Ulloa, A. y S. Coronado (eds.) (2016): Ext:activismos y posconflicto en Colombia: retos para la paz territorial, Bogotá, Universidad Nacional de Colombia- CINEP.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
NULL, & NULL, N. (2020) · Espacios · doi:10.48082/espacios-a20v41n47p25
- Authors
- González Gil, A.
- Affiliations
- Instituto de Estudios Políticos, Universidad de Antioquia
- Venue
- Política y Sociedad
- Published
- 2019-05-16
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 87-105
- ISSN
- 1130-8001 (ISSN-L)
- 1988-3129
- OpenAlex
- W2949670622
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 1.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- es
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Política y Sociedad (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Extractivism and Socioeconomic Issues
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Mining and Resource Management
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Latin American socio-political dynamics
- Keywords
- mining, social mobilization, popular consultation, territorial rights, extractivism, social conflict, right to protest, participatory democracy, Colombia
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review