Cited by 35Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentPsychological Testing and AssessmentPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

DSM-Oriented Scales of the Child Behavior Checklist and Youth Self-Report in Clinically Referred Spanish Children

Lacalle, Montserrat, Ezpeleta, Lourdes, Doménech, Josep M.·2012·The Spanish journal of psychology

Abstract

The Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment (ASEBA) is an example of the efforts to integrate categorical and dimensional assessment methods. The latest editions of the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) and the Youth Self-Report (YSR) included the DSM-Oriented Scales, constructed in rational manner based on the items making up these inventories. Objective: To analyze the psychometric properties of the DSM-Oriented Scales of the CBCL and YSR. Method: A clinical sample of 420 children and adolescents (aged 8-17 years) was assessed with the CBCL and YSR, with a structured diagnostic interview and with measures of functional impairment to study the reliability and validity of the DSM-Oriented Scales. Results: Internal consistency ranged from moderate to good for all the scales except the DSM-Anxiety Problems Scale. Agreement between parents and children ranged between moderate and low values. Kappa coefficients showed moderate agreement in the different symptoms. The DSM-Oriented Scales presented acceptable diagnostic power for DSM-IV disorders and a significant relationship with measures of functional impairment. Conclusion: The DSM-Oriented Scales constitute a useful approach from the dimensional model to the DSM-IV disorders in Spanish clinical population.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5209/rev_sjop.2012.v15.n1.37344

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 48 · Cited by 35

Authors
Lacalle, M., Ezpeleta, L., & Doménech, J. M.
Affiliations
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
Venue
The Spanish journal of psychology
Published
2012-03
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
377-387
ISSN
  • 1138-7416 (ISSN-L)
  • 1988-2904
OpenAlex
W2110950256
Cited by
35
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Spanish Journal of Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
Child Behavior Checklist, Youth Self-Report, ASEBA, dimensional assessment, DSM-IV disorders, psychometric properties, reliability statistics, validity, parent-child agreement, functional disability, children and adolescents, Spanish children
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Mental Disorders, Child, Child Behavior Disorders, Female, Humans, Interview, Psychological, Male, Personality Assessment, Psychometrics, Referral and Consultation, Spain, Reproducibility of Results, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Checklist

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review