DSM-Oriented Scales of the Child Behavior Checklist and Youth Self-Report in Clinically Referred Spanish Children
Abstract
The Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment (ASEBA) is an example of the efforts to integrate categorical and dimensional assessment methods. The latest editions of the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) and the Youth Self-Report (YSR) included the DSM-Oriented Scales, constructed in rational manner based on the items making up these inventories. Objective: To analyze the psychometric properties of the DSM-Oriented Scales of the CBCL and YSR. Method: A clinical sample of 420 children and adolescents (aged 8-17 years) was assessed with the CBCL and YSR, with a structured diagnostic interview and with measures of functional impairment to study the reliability and validity of the DSM-Oriented Scales. Results: Internal consistency ranged from moderate to good for all the scales except the DSM-Anxiety Problems Scale. Agreement between parents and children ranged between moderate and low values. Kappa coefficients showed moderate agreement in the different symptoms. The DSM-Oriented Scales presented acceptable diagnostic power for DSM-IV disorders and a significant relationship with measures of functional impairment. Conclusion: The DSM-Oriented Scales constitute a useful approach from the dimensional model to the DSM-IV disorders in Spanish clinical population.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Studies have demonstrated an acceptable correspondence between the CBCL DSM-oriented scales and DSM diagnoses.
“Studies have demonstrated an acceptable correspondence between the DSM-oriented scales and DSM diagnoses [33–40].”
From Screen time and mental health: a prospective analysis of the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study (2024) · cites this paper as [39]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 48 · Cited by 35
- Authors
- Lacalle, M., Ezpeleta, L., & Doménech, J. M.
- Affiliations
- Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
- ORCID
- Ezpeleta, Lourdes
- Venue
- The Spanish journal of psychology
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2012-03
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 377-387
- ISSN
- 1138-7416 (ISSN-L)
- 1988-2904
- OpenAlex
- W2110950256
- Cited by
- 35
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 1.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Spanish Journal of Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Keywords
- Child Behavior Checklist, Youth Self-Report, ASEBA, dimensional assessment, DSM-IV disorders, psychometric properties, reliability statistics, validity, parent-child agreement, functional disability, children and adolescents, Spanish children
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Mental Disorders, Child, Child Behavior Disorders, Female, Humans, Interview, Psychological, Male, Personality Assessment, Psychometrics, Referral and Consultation, Spain, Reproducibility of Results, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Checklist
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review