The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Prior Lessons of Incremental Dialogue and Robot Action Management for the Age of Language Models
Open accessAbstract
Efforts towards endowing robots with the ability to speak have benefited from recent advancements in natural language processing, in particular large language models. However, current language models are not fully incremental, as their processing is inherently monotonic and thus lack the ability to revise their interpretations or output in light of newer observations. This monotonicity has important implications for the development of dialogue systems for human–robot interaction. In this paper, we review the literature on interactive systems that operate incrementally (i.e., at the word level or below it). We motivate the need for incremental systems, survey incremental modeling of important aspects of dialogue like speech recognition and language generation. Primary focus is on the part of the system that makes decisions, known as the dialogue manager. We find that there is very little research on incremental dialogue management, offer some requirements for practical incremental dialogue management, and implications of incremental dialogue for embodied, robotic platforms in the age of large language models.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Despite substantial progress, the tool use paradigm exhibits significant limitations in multi-turn dialogue scenarios in which required information is provided incrementally and in diverse linguistic forms [15].”
From A State-Aware Dual-Tool Architecture for Improved Tool Use in Multi-Turn LLM Dialogue (2026) · cites this paper as [15]
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A State-Aware Dual-Tool Architecture for Improved Tool Use in Multi-Turn LLM Dialogue
Pałgan, B., Wawryszczuk, M., Chwał, J., Tkacz, E., & Dzik, R. (2026) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app16094329 · Cited by 1
Scaffolding Early Dialogue: A Unified Account of Response Contingency in Child–Caregiver Interaction
Agrawal, A., Favre, B., & Fourtassi, A. (2026) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.70245 · Cited by 1
Wrede, B., Buschmeier, H., Rohlfing, K. J., Booshehri, M., & Grimminger, A. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-96-5290-7_12
Hatano, Y., Baba, J., Nakanishi, J., Yoshikawa, Y., & Ishiguro, H. (2026) · ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.1145/3846183
Metadata
- Authors
- Kennington, C., Lison, P., & Schlangen, D.
- Affiliations
- Boise State University (US)
- Norwegian Computing Center (NO)
- University of Potsdam (DE)
- Venue
- Dialogue & Discourse
- Publisher
- University of Illinois Libraries
- Published
- 2025-12-15
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 96-130
- ISSN
- 2152-9620 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4417356858
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4
- FWCI
- 1.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Dialogue & Discourse (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Keywords
- dialogue manager, large language models, human-robot interaction, robot speech, incremental modeling, speech recognition, language generation, embodied robots, monotonicity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prior Lessons of Incremental Dialogue and Robot Action Management for the Age of Language Models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5210/dad.2025.305
- The paper
- Kennington, C., Lison, P., & Schlangen, D. (2025). Prior Lessons of Incremental Dialogue and Robot Action Management for the Age of Language Models. Dialogue & Discourse. https://doi.org/10.5210/dad.2025.305