Gaydar: Facebook Friendships Expose Sexual Orientation
Open accessAbstract
Public information about one's coworkers, friends, family, and acquaintances, as well as one's associations with them, implicitly reveals private information. Social-networking websites, e-mail, instant messaging, telephone, and VoIP are all technologies steeped in network data—data relating one person to another. Network data shifts the locus of information control away from individuals, as the individual's traditional and absolute discretion is replaced by that of his social-network. Our research demonstrates a method for accurately predicting the sexual orientation of Facebook users by analyzing friendship associations. After analyzing 4,080 Facebook profiles from the MIT network, we determined that the percentage of a given user's friends who self-identify as gay male is strongly correlated with the sexual orientation of that user, and we developed a logistic regression classifier with strong predictive power. Although we studied Facebook friendship ties, network data is pervasive in the broader context of computer-mediated communication, raising significant privacy issues for communication technologies to which there are no neat solutions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A dataset that does not contain explicit data about people's sexual orientation can still give information about people's sexual orientation.
“a dataset that does not contain explicit data about people's sexual orientation can still give information about people's sexual orientation.”
From Discrimination, artificial intelligence, and algorithmic decision-making (2025) · cites this paper as Jernigan and Mistree 2009
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dwork, C., Hardt, M., Pitassi, T., Reingold, O., & Zemel, R. (2012) · Proceedings of the 3rd Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference · doi:10.1145/2090236.2090255 · Cited by 3,501 · see citing works
Private traits and attributes are predictable from digital records of human behavior
Kosinski, M., Stillwell, D., & Graepel, T. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1218772110 · Cited by 2,829 · see citing works
Barocas, S., & Selbst, A. D. (2014) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2477899 · Cited by 3,048 · see citing works
Wang, Y., & Kosinski, M. (2018) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspa0000098 · Cited by 766 · see citing works
Big Data’s End Run around Anonymity and Consent
Barocas, S., & Nissenbaum, H. (2014) · Privacy, Big Data, and the Public Good · doi:10.1017/cbo9781107590205.004 · Cited by 320 · see citing works
Discrimination, artificial intelligence, and algorithmic decision-making
Borgesius, F. Z. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.13465 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
“49 Jernigan and Mistree 2009.”
Privacy is an essentially contested concept: a multi-dimensional analytic for mapping privacy
Mulligan, D. K., Koopman, C., & Doty, N. (2016) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2016.0118 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
IoT Big Data Security and Privacy Versus Innovation
Sollins, K. R. (2019) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2019.2898113 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Data science as machinic neoplatonism
McQuillan, D. (2018) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-017-0273-3 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Revisiting Social Network Utilization by Physicians-in-Training
Black, E. W., Thompson, L. A., Duff, W. P., Dawson, K., Saliba, H., & Black, N. M. P. (2010) · Journal of Graduate Medical Education · doi:10.4300/jgme-d-10-00011.1 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Bias in artificial intelligence systems
Rejmaniak, R. (2021) · Białostockie Studia Prawnicze · doi:10.15290/bsp.2021.26.03.02 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
- Authors
- Jernigan, C., & Mistree, B. F. T.
- Venue
- First Monday
- Publisher
- University of Illinois Libraries
- Published
- 2009-09-25
- ISSN
- 1396-0458 (ISSN-L)
- 1396-0466
- OpenAlex
- W2085427378
- Cited by
- 222
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 40.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- First Monday (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Authorship Attribution and Profiling
- Keywords
- Facebook, friendship networks, social network analysis, privacy, network data, computer-mediated communication, social networking sites, logistic regression classifier
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review