The 'Digital Divide' Among Financially Disadvantaged Families in Australia
Open accessAbstract
Despite figures suggesting that Australia is a high consumer of information and communication technologies (ICT), it is well documented that the pattern of this consumption is not spread evenly across the population; a 'digital divide' exists. In general, research suggests that people from higher socioeconomic backgrounds have greater access to ICT compared to those from lower socioeconomic backgrounds. A less well-researched area is the factors that may influence ICT access and usage within certain demographic and socioeconomic groups. This paper presents new data on the access and usage of ICT (computers and the Internet) by 3,404 households and 6,874 children from financially disadvantaged backgrounds. Fifty-nine per cent of the sample had a home computer and just under one-third had the Internet connected at home. The most common location for accessing the Internet was at school. A striking finding was the strong association between the level of parental education and ICT access and use. Schools are important in closing or levelling the access gap, as most students use computers and the Internet at school. However, considering the importance of having home Internet access for children's educational performance, the fact that almost three-quarters of students in this study did not use the Internet at home is of concern, particularly given that almost half of a comparable Australian population have home Internet access. Finding ways to increase the home access of low-income families to the Internet should therefore remain a policy priority for all sectors aiming to bridge the digital divide. Policies aimed at bridging the digital divide should also ensure that programs provide appropriate parenting support and emphasise the educational importance of having home access to computers and the Internet.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Students' socio-economic backgrounds are significant predictors of ICT literacy, independent of students' access to and frequency of ICT use.
“Students' socio-economic backgrounds, including the language spoken at home, the number of books at home, the parents' educational level, household income, access to ICT, and academic aspirations, have been identified as significant predictors of ICT literacy (Hatlevik & Gudmundsdottir, 2013;McLaren & Zappala, 2002;Warschauer, 2003), independent of students' access to and frequency of ICT use.”
From Taking a future perspective by learning from the past – A systematic review of assessment instruments that aim to measure primary and secondary school students' ICT literacy (2016) · cites this paper as McLaren & Zappala, 2002
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Siddiq, F., Hatlevik, O. E., Olsen, R. V., Throndsen, I., & Scherer, R. (2016) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2016.05.002 · Cited by 269 · see citing works
Vicious cycles: digital technologies and determinants of health in Australia
Baum, F., Newman, L., & Biedrzycki, K. (2014) · Health Promotion International · doi:10.1093/heapro/das062 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
- Authors
- McLaren, J., & Zappala, G.
- Venue
- First Monday
- Publisher
- University of Illinois Libraries
- Published
- 2002-11-04
- ISSN
- 1396-0458 (ISSN-L)
- 1396-0466
- OpenAlex
- W2112410622
- Cited by
- 42
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 12.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- First Monday (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › ICT Impact and Policies
- Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Information Society and Technology Trends
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Innovations and Technology
- Keywords
- digital divide, ICT access, home internet access, home computers, low-income households, financial disadvantage, parental education, socioeconomic disparities, digital inclusion policy, parenting support
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review