The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Scalable Framework for Dynamic Data Citation of Arbitrary Structured Data
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Approaches that allow for robust and granular references to subsets of dynamic datasets exist only for the centralized and closed-world setting of database systems.
“Moreover, only for the centralized and closed-world setting of database systems, approaches exist that allow for robust and granular references to subsets of dynamic datasets (Proell & Rauber, 2014).”
From Decentralized provenance-aware publishing with nanopublications (2016) · cites this paper as Proell & Rauber, 2014
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bertin-Mahieux, T., Ellis, D. P. W., Whitman, B., & Lamere, P. (2011) · Columbia University · doi:10.7916/d8nz8j07 · Cited by 944
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Decentralized provenance-aware publishing with nanopublications
Kuhn, T., Chichester, C., Krauthammer, M., Queralt-Rosinach, N., Verborgh, R., Giannakopoulos, G., Ngonga Ngomo, A.-C., Viglianti, R., & Dumontier, M. (2016) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.78 · Cited by 90
Metadata
- Authors
- Pröll, S., & Rauber, A.
- Affiliations
- SBA Research and Technical University of Vienna, Austria
- SBA Research, Austria
- Venue
- Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Data Management Technologies and Applications
- Published
- 2014
- Pages
- 223-230
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 1
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
