Cited by 1,213Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-votingNetwork Security and Intrusion DetectionImage and Video Quality Assessment

Characterization of Encrypted and VPN Traffic using Time-related Features

Open access
Draper-Gil, Gerard, Lashkari, Arash Habibi, Mamun, Mohammad Saiful Islam, A. Ghorbani, Ali·2016·Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Information Systems Security and Privacy

Abstract

Traffic characterization is one of the major challenges in today’s security industry. The continuous evolution and generation of new applications and services, together with the expansion of encrypted communications makes it a difficult task. Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) are an example of encrypted communication service that is becoming popular, as method for bypassing censorship as well as accessing services that are geographically locked. In this paper, we study the effectiveness of flow-based time-related features to detect VPN traffic and to characterize encrypted traffic into different categories, according to the type of traffic e.g., browsing, streaming, etc. We use two different well-known machine learning techniques (C4.5 and KNN) to test the accuracy of our features. Our results show high accuracy and performance, confirming that time-related features are good classifiers for encrypted traffic characterization.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5220/0005740700001242

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

Cited by 1,213

Authors
Draper-Gil, G., Lashkari, A. H., Mamun, M. S. I., & A. Ghorbani, A.
Affiliations
  • University of New Brunswick (CA)
  • University of New Brunswick, Canada
Venue
Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Information Systems Security and Privacy
Published
2016
Pages
407-414
OpenAlex
W2343828539
Cited by
1,213
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 155 · 2025: 209 · 2024: 216 · 2023: 175 · 2022: 157 · 2021: 139 · 2020: 76 · 2019: 51 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 8 · 2015: 1
FWCI
15.27
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • International Conference on Information Systems Security and Privacy (ICISSP) (publishedVersion)
  • International Conference on Information Systems Security and Privacy (ICISSP) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Video Quality Assessment
Keywords
virtual private networks, network flow features, network traffic classification, streaming traffic, C4.5 decision tree, k-nearest neighbors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review