Coarse-to-fine vision-language pre-training with fusion in the backbone
Open accessAbstract
Vision-language (VL) pre-training has recently received considerable attention. However, most existing end-to-end pre-training approaches either only aim to tackle VL tasks such as image-text retrieval, visual question answering (VQA) and image captioning that test high-level understanding of images, or only target region-level understanding for tasks such as phrase grounding and object detection. We present FIBER (Fusion-In-the-Backbone-based transformER), a new VL model architecture that can seamlessly handle both these types of tasks. Instead of having dedicated transformer layers for fusion after the uni-modal backbones, FIBER pushes multimodal fusion deep into the model by inserting cross-attention into the image and text backbones, bringing gains in terms of memory and performance. In addition, unlike previous work that is either only pre-trained on image-text data or on fine-grained data with box-level annotations, we present a two-stage pre-training strategy that uses both these kinds of data efficiently: (i) coarse-grained pre-training based on image-text data; followed by (ii) fine-grained pre-training based on image-text-box data. We conduct comprehensive experiments on a wide range of VL tasks, ranging from VQA, image captioning, and retrieval, to phrase grounding, referring expression comprehension, and object detection. Using deep multimodal fusion coupled with the two-stage pre-training, FIBER provides consistent performance improvements over strong baselines across all tasks, often outperforming methods using magnitudes more data. Code is available at https://github.com/microsoft/FIBER.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Cross-modal pre-training typically creates a shared embedding space where data from various modalities are projected, allowing the model to learn relationships.
“This is typically achieved by creating a shared embedding space where data from various modalities (such as images, text, audio, video, etc.) are projected into the same space, allowing the model to learn the relationships between these modalities [169,170].”
From Multimodal fusion and vision–language models: A survey for robot vision (2026) · cites this paper as [170]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Vision-Language Models for Vision Tasks: A Survey
Zhang, J., Huang, J., Jin, S., & Lu, S. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2024.3369699 · Cited by 1,051 · see citing works
Foundation Models Defining a New Era in Vision: A Survey and Outlook
Awais, M., Naseer, M., Khan, S., Anwer, R. M., Cholakkal, H., Shah, M., Yang, M.-H., & Khan, F. S. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2024.3506283 · Cited by 304 · see citing works
Vision-Language Pre-Training: Basics, Recent Advances, and Future Trends
Gan, Z., Li, L., Li, C., Wang, L., Liu, Z., & Gao, J. (2022) · Foundations and Trends® in Computer Graphics and Vision · doi:10.1561/0600000105 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Self-citationMultimodal Foundation Models: From Specialists to General-Purpose Assistants
Li, C., Gan, Z., Yang, Z., Yang, J., Li, L., Wang, L., & Gao, J. (2024) · Foundations and Trends® in Computer Graphics and Vision · doi:10.1561/0600000110 · Cited by 225 · see citing works
Self-citationMultimodal fusion and vision–language models: A survey for robot vision
Han, X., Chen, S., Fu, Z., Feng, Z., Fan, L., An, D., Wang, C., Guo, L., Meng, W., Zhang, X., et al. (2026) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2025.103652 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Learning visual language models for video understanding
Yang, A. (2023) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/802872a7z8092z4556za1fdz2c7af45f0e72 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
SDPT: Synchronous Dual Prompt Tuning for Visual-Language Pre-Trained Models
Zhou, Y., Wu, Y., Saiyin, J., Wei, B., & Xu, Y. (2026) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2026.3692711 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Robust Onion: Peeling Open Vocab Object Detectors Under Noise
Pathak, P., Karuppasamy, M., Baranwal, A., Vyas, S., & Rawat, Y. S. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-37095-2_20 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Study of the multimodal understanding of vision-language transformer models
Salin, E. (2023) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/2beca704z5d3bz421dzbf61z61e00610aaeb
Deep Learning Algorithms and AI Technologies for Optimizing Language Multimodal Performance
Zhu, Z., Wang, J., & Chen, J. (2025) · doi:10.1109/cnc68716.2025.11484909
Zhang, W., Li, X., Gao, C., et al. (2025) · IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv51701.2025.00119
Representation Learning with Semantic-Aware Instance and Sparse Token Alignments
Bui, P.-N., Nguyen, T. D., Bum, J., Le, D.-T., & Choo, H. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-31583-0_30 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
CLARA-Net: Material-Aware Expert Networks for Fine-Grained Craftsmanship Retrieval
Sun, Z., Zhang, D., Yuan, X., et al. (2026) · doi:10.1145/3838457.3838510
A unified framework for fine-grained open vocabulary object detection
Ma, Y., Liu, T., Zhu, C., et al. (2026) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2026.135253
- Authors
- Dou, Z.-Y., Kamath, A., Gan, Z., Zhang, P., Wang, J., Li, L., Liu, Z., Liu, C., Lecun, Y., Peng, N., Gao, J., & Wang, L.
- Venue
- Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35
- Published
- 2022
- Pages
- 32942-32956
- ISSN
- 1049-5258 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W7133208656
- Cited by
- 93
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 7.89
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- neural information processing systems (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Keywords
- vision-language pre-training, multimodal fusion, vision-language models
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review