Cited by 93Multimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

Coarse-to-fine vision-language pre-training with fusion in the backbone

Open access
Dou, Zi-Yi, Kamath, Aishwarya, Gan, Zhe, Zhang, Pengchuan, Wang, Jianfeng, Li, Linjie, Liu, Zicheng, Liu, Ce +4 more·2022·Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35

Abstract

Vision-language (VL) pre-training has recently received considerable attention. However, most existing end-to-end pre-training approaches either only aim to tackle VL tasks such as image-text retrieval, visual question answering (VQA) and image captioning that test high-level understanding of images, or only target region-level understanding for tasks such as phrase grounding and object detection. We present FIBER (Fusion-In-the-Backbone-based transformER), a new VL model architecture that can seamlessly handle both these types of tasks. Instead of having dedicated transformer layers for fusion after the uni-modal backbones, FIBER pushes multimodal fusion deep into the model by inserting cross-attention into the image and text backbones, bringing gains in terms of memory and performance. In addition, unlike previous work that is either only pre-trained on image-text data or on fine-grained data with box-level annotations, we present a two-stage pre-training strategy that uses both these kinds of data efficiently: (i) coarse-grained pre-training based on image-text data; followed by (ii) fine-grained pre-training based on image-text-box data. We conduct comprehensive experiments on a wide range of VL tasks, ranging from VQA, image captioning, and retrieval, to phrase grounding, referring expression comprehension, and object detection. Using deep multimodal fusion coupled with the two-stage pre-training, FIBER provides consistent performance improvements over strong baselines across all tasks, often outperforming methods using magnitudes more data. Code is available at https://github.com/microsoft/FIBER.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.52202/068431-2387

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cross-modal pre-training typically creates a shared embedding space where data from various modalities are projected, allowing the model to learn relationships.

    “This is typically achieved by creating a shared embedding space where data from various modalities (such as images, text, audio, video, etc.) are projected into the same space, allowing the model to learn the relationships between these modalities [169,170].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dou, Z.-Y., Kamath, A., Gan, Z., Zhang, P., Wang, J., Li, L., Liu, Z., Liu, C., Lecun, Y., Peng, N., Gao, J., & Wang, L.
Venue
Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35
Published
2022
Pages
32942-32956
ISSN
1049-5258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7133208656
Cited by
93
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 1
FWCI
7.89
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • neural information processing systems (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Keywords
vision-language pre-training, multimodal fusion, vision-language models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review