The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Learning Partial Equivariances from Data
Open accessAbstract
Group Convolutional Neural Networks (G-CNNs) constrain learned features to respect the symmetries in the selected group, and lead to better generalization when these symmetries appear in the data. If this is not the case, however, equivariance leads to overly constrained models and worse performance. Frequently, transformations occurring in data can be better represented by a subset of a group than by a group as a whole, e.g., rotations in $[-90^{\circ}, 90^{\circ}]$. In such cases, a model that respects equivariance $\textit{partially}$ is better suited to represent the data. In addition, relevant transformations may differ for low and high-level features. For instance, full rotation equivariance is useful to describe edge orientations in a face, but partial rotation equivariance is better suited to describe face poses relative to the camera. In other words, the optimal level of equivariance may differ per layer. In this work, we introduce $\textit{Partial G-CNNs}$: G-CNNs able to learn layer-wise levels of partial and full equivariance to discrete, continuous groups and combinations thereof as part of training. Partial G-CNNs retain full equivariance when beneficial, e.g., for rotated MNIST, but adjust it whenever it becomes harmful, e.g., for classification of 6 / 9 digits or natural images. We empirically show that partial G-CNNs pair G-CNNs when full equivariance is advantageous, and outperform them otherwise.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“This supports the theory given in [17] which states that partial rotation equivariance is better suited to describe the relative pose of high-level features in the scene, whereas full-equivariance is better suited for low-level features.”
From MARs: Multi-view Attention Regularizations for Patch-based Feature Recognition of Space Terrain (2024) · cites this paper as [17]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 47
- [1][1] F. Alet, D. Doblar, A. Zhou, J. Tenenbaum, K. Kawaguchi, and C. Finn. Noether networks: meta-learning useful conserved quantities. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 34, 2021. -
- [2][2] B. E. Bejnordi, M. Veta, P. J. Van Diest, B. Van Ginneken, N. Karssemeijer, G. Litjens, J. A. Van Der Laak, M. Hermsen, Q. F. Manson, M. Balkenhol, et al. Diagnostic assessment of deep learning algorithms for detection of lymph node metastases in women with breast cancer. Jama , 318(22):2199-2210, 2017. -
- [3][3] G. Benton, M. Finzi, P. Izmailov, and A. G. Wilson. Learning invariances in neural networks from training data. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 33:17605-17616, 2020. -
- [4][4] A. Bogatskiy, B. Anderson, J. Offermann, M. Roussi, D. Miller, and R. Kondor. Lorentz group equivariant neural network for particle physics. In International Conference on Machine Learning , pages 992-1002. PMLR, 2020. -
- [5][5] E. Chatzipantazis, S. Pertigkiozoglou, E. Dobriban, and K. Daniilidis. Learning augmentation distributions using transformed risk minimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.08190 , 2021. - · arXiv
- [6][6] S. Chen, E. Dobriban, and J. H. Lee. A group-theoretic framework for data augmentation. Journal of Machine Learning Research , 21(245):1-71, 2020. -
- [7][7] T. Cohen and M. Welling. Group equivariant convolutional networks. In International conference on machine learning , pages 2990-2999. PMLR, 2016. -
- [8][8] T. S. Cohen, M. Geiger, J. Köhler, and M. Welling. Spherical cnns. In International Conference on Learning Representations , 2018. -
- [9][9] T. S. Cohen, M. Geiger, and M. Weiler. A general theory of equivariant cnns on homogeneous spaces. Advances in neural information processing systems , 32, 2019. -
- [10][10] N. Dehmamy, R. Walters, Y. Liu, D. Wang, and R. Yu. Automatic symmetry discovery with lie algebra convolutional network. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 34, 2021. -
- [11][11] S. Dieleman, J. De Fauw, and K. Kavukcuoglu. Exploiting cyclic symmetry in convolutional neural networks. In International conference on machine learning , pages 1889-1898. PMLR, 2016. -
- [12][12] C. Esteves, A. Sud, Z. Luo, K. Daniilidis, and A. Makadia. Cross-domain 3d equivariant image embeddings. In International Conference on Machine Learning , pages 1812-1822. PMLR, 2019. -
- [13][13] C. Esteves, Y. Xu, C. Allen-Blanchette, and K. Daniilidis. Equivariant multi-view networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , pages 1568-1577, 2019. -
- [14][14] C. Esteves, A. Makadia, and K. Daniilidis. Spin-weighted spherical cnns. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 33:8614-8625, 2020. -
- [15][15] L. Falorsi, P. de Haan, T. R. Davidson, and P. Forré. Reparameterizing distributions on lie groups. In The 22nd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics , pages 3244-3253. PMLR, 2019. -
- [16][16] M. Finzi, S. Stanton, P. Izmailov, and A. G. Wilson. Generalizing convolutional neural networks for equivariance to lie groups on arbitrary continuous data. In International Conference on Machine Learning , pages 3165-3176. PMLR, 2020. -
- [17][17] M. Finzi, G. Benton, and A. G. Wilson. Residual pathway priors for soft equivariance constraints. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 34, 2021. -
- [18][18] M. Finzi, M. Welling, and A. G. Wilson. A practical method for constructing equivariant multilayer perceptrons for arbitrary matrix groups. In International Conference on Machine Learning , pages 3318-3328. PMLR, 2021. -
- [19][19] F. Fuchs, D. Worrall, V. Fischer, and M. Welling. Se (3)-transformers: 3d roto-translation equivariant attention networks. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 33:19701981, 2020. -
- [20][20] R. Hataya, J. Zdenek, K. Yoshizoe, and H. Nakayama. Faster autoaugment: Learning augmentation strategies using backpropagation. In European Conference on Computer Vision , pages 1-16. Springer, 2020. -
- [21][21] E. Hoogeboom, J. Peters, R. Van Den Berg, and M. Welling. Integer discrete flows and lossless compression. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 32, 2019. -
- [22][22] E. Hoogeboom, D. Nielsen, P. Jaini, P. Forré, and M. Welling. Argmax flows and multinomial diffusion: Towards non-autoregressive language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.05379 , 2021. - · arXiv
- [23][23] M. J. Hutchinson, C. Le Lan, S. Zaidi, E. Dupont, Y. W. Teh, and H. Kim. Lietransformer: equivariant self-attention for lie groups. In International Conference on Machine Learning , pages 4533-4543. PMLR, 2021. -
- [24][24] S. Ioffe and C. Szegedy. Batch normalization: Accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift. In International conference on machine learning , pages 448-456. PMLR, 2015. -
- [25][25] E. Jang, S. Gu, and B. Poole. Categorical reparameterization with gumbel-softmax. arXiv preprint arXiv:1611.01144 , 2016. - · arXiv
- [26][26] D. P. Kingma and M. Welling. Auto-encoding variational bayes. arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.6114 , 2013. - · arXiv
- [27][27] D. M. Knigge, D. W. Romero, and E. J. Bekkers. Exploiting redundancy: Separable group convolutional networks on lie groups. In International Conference on Machine Learning , pages 11359-11386. PMLR, 2022. -
- [29][29] S. Laine and T. Aila. Temporal ensembling for semi-supervised learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1610.02242 , 2016. - · arXiv
- [30][30] H. Larochelle, D. Erhan, A. Courville, J. Bergstra, and Y. Bengio. An empirical evaluation of deep architectures on problems with many factors of variation. In Proceedings of the 24th international conference on Machine learning , pages 473-480, 2007. -
- [31][31] Y. LeCun, L. Bottou, Y. Bengio, and P. Haffner. Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE , 86(11):2278-2324, 1998. -
- [32][32] A. Lengyel and J. van Gemert. Exploiting learned symmetries in group equivariant convolutions. In 2021 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP) , pages 759-763. IEEE, 2021. -
- [34][34] S. Lim, I. Kim, T. Kim, C. Kim, and S. Kim. Fast autoaugment. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 32, 2019. -
- [35][35] C. J. Maddison, A. Mnih, and Y. W. Teh. The concrete distribution: A continuous relaxation of discrete random variables. arXiv preprint arXiv:1611.00712 , 2016. - · arXiv
- [36][36] D. Romero, E. Bekkers, J. Tomczak, and M. Hoogendoorn. Attentive group equivariant convolutional networks. In International Conference on Machine Learning , pages 8188-8199. PMLR, 2020. -
- [37][37] D. W. Romero and J.-B. Cordonnier. Group equivariant stand-alone self-attention for vision. In International Conference on Learning Representations , 2020. -
- [38][38] D. W. Romero, E. J. Bekkers, J. M. Tomczak, and M. Hoogendoorn. Wavelet networks: Scale equivariant learning from raw waveforms. arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.05259 , 2020. - · arXiv
- [40][40] K. T. Schütt, P.-J. Kindermans, H. E. Sauceda, S. Chmiela, A. Tkatchenko, and K.-R. Müller. Schnet: A continuous-filter convolutional neural network for modeling quantum interactions. arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.08566 , 2017. - · arXiv
- [41][41] V. Sitzmann, J. Martel, A. Bergman, D. Lindell, and G. Wetzstein. Implicit neural representations with periodic activation functions. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 33, 2020. -
- [43][43] T. F. van der Ouderaa and M. van der Wilk. Learning invariant weights in neural networks. Workshop in Uncertainty & Robustness in Deep Learning, ICML , 2021. -
- [44][44] M. van der Wilk, M. Bauer, S. John, and J. Hensman. Learning invariances using the marginal likelihood. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 31, 2018. -
- [45][45] B. S. Veeling, J. Linmans, J. Winkens, T. Cohen, and M. Welling. Rotation equivariant cnns for digital pathology. In International Conference on Medical image computing and computerassisted intervention , pages 210-218. Springer, 2018. -
- [46][46] M. Weiler and G. Cesa. General e (2)-equivariant steerable cnns. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 32, 2019. -
- [47][47] M. Weiler, M. Geiger, M. Welling, W. Boomsma, and T. Cohen. 3d steerable cnns: Learning rotationally equivariant features in volumetric data. arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.02547 , 2018. - · arXiv
- [48][48] M. Weiler, F. A. Hamprecht, and M. Storath. Learning steerable filters for rotation equivariant cnns. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 849-858, 2018. -
- [49][49] D. Worrall and M. Welling. Deep scale-spaces: Equivariance over scale. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 32, 2019. -
- [50][50] D. E. Worrall, S. J. Garbin, D. Turmukhambetov, and G. J. Brostow. Harmonic networks: Deep translation and rotation equivariance. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 5028-5037, 2017. -
- [51][51] A. Zhou, T. Knowles, and C. Finn. Meta-learning symmetries by reparameterization. In International Conference on Learning Representations , 2020.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
MARs: Multi-view Attention Regularizations for Patch-based Feature Recognition of Space Terrain
Chase, T., & Dantu, K. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.05182 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Romero, D. W., & Lohit, S.
- ORCID
- Lohit, Suhas
- Venue
- Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35
- Published
- 2022
- Pages
- 36466-36478
- ISSN
- 1049-5258 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W7133207135
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 0.69
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- neural information processing systems (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories
- Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (P16-25)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Algorithms
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
- Keywords
- equivariant neural networks
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review