Muse-gnn: Learning unified gene representation from multimodal biological graph data
Open accessAbstract
Discovering genes with similar functions across diverse biomedical contexts poses a significant challenge in gene representation learning due to data heterogeneity. In this study, we resolve this problem by introducing a novel model called Multimodal Similarity Learning Graph Neural Network, which combines Multimodal Machine Learning and Deep Graph Neural Networks to learn gene representations from single-cell sequencing and spatial transcriptomic data. Leveraging 82 training datasets from 10 tissues, three sequencing techniques, and three species, we create informative graph structures for model training and gene representations generation, while incorporating regularization with weighted similarity learning and contrastive learning to learn cross-data gene-gene relationships. This novel design ensures that we can offer gene representations containing functional similarity across different contexts in a joint space. Comprehensive benchmarking analysis shows our model's capacity to effectively capture gene function similarity across multiple modalities, outperforming state-of-the-art methods in gene representation learning by up to 97.5%. Moreover, we employ bioinformatics tools in conjunction with gene representations to uncover pathway enrichment, regulation causal networks, and functions of disease-associated or dosage-sensitive genes. Therefore, our model efficiently produces unified gene representations for the analysis of gene functions, tissue functions, diseases, and species evolution.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Unlike ROI-level fusion of MV3D and AVOD, MVX-Net's VoxelFusion is voxel-level.
“Unlike the ROI-level fusion of MV3D [5] and AVOD [71], the Vox-elFusion fusion strategy proposed in MVX-Net [79] is voxellevel.”
From Multimodal fusion and vision–language models: A survey for robot vision (2026) · cites this paper as [71]
Early fusion methods such as MV3D and AVOD are generally attention-agnostic, relying on direct concatenation or feature pooling.
“Early fusion methods, such as those used in MV3D [5] and AVOD [71], are generally attention-agnostic, relying on direct concatenation or feature pooling to combine multimodal data.”
From Multimodal fusion and vision–language models: A survey for robot vision (2026) · cites this paper as [71]
AVOD designed a high-resolution feature extractor based on encoder-decoder structure.
“To address this issue, AVOD [71] designed a high-resolution feature extractor based on an encoder-decoder structure.”
From Multimodal fusion and vision–language models: A survey for robot vision (2026) · cites this paper as [71]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Multimodal fusion and vision–language models: A survey for robot vision
Han, X., Chen, S., Fu, Z., Feng, Z., Fan, L., An, D., Wang, C., Guo, L., Meng, W., Zhang, X., et al. (2026) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2025.103652 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
A high-efficiency 3D-stacked accelerator for deep graph neural network inference
Long, Z., Zhang, Y., Yutao, F. U., et al. (2026) · Scientia Sinica Informationis · doi:10.1360/ssi-2025-0381
Multimodal graph neural network with large language models for node and link prediction
Peng, B., Xu, H. G., & Che, X. (2026) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2026.1758852
- Authors
- Liu, T., Wang, Y., Ying, R., & Zhao, H.
- Venue
- Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36
- Published
- 2023
- Pages
- 24661-24677
- ISSN
- 1049-5258 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W7133214670
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 18.46
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- neural information processing systems (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Graph Neural Networks
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
- Keywords
- graph neural networks, biological networks, gene function prediction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review