Cited by 15Bioinformatics and Genomic NetworksAdvanced Graph Neural NetworksGene Regulatory Network Analysis

Muse-gnn: Learning unified gene representation from multimodal biological graph data

Open access
Liu, Tianyu, Wang, Yuge, Ying, Rex, Zhao, Hongyu·2023·Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36

Abstract

Discovering genes with similar functions across diverse biomedical contexts poses a significant challenge in gene representation learning due to data heterogeneity. In this study, we resolve this problem by introducing a novel model called Multimodal Similarity Learning Graph Neural Network, which combines Multimodal Machine Learning and Deep Graph Neural Networks to learn gene representations from single-cell sequencing and spatial transcriptomic data. Leveraging 82 training datasets from 10 tissues, three sequencing techniques, and three species, we create informative graph structures for model training and gene representations generation, while incorporating regularization with weighted similarity learning and contrastive learning to learn cross-data gene-gene relationships. This novel design ensures that we can offer gene representations containing functional similarity across different contexts in a joint space. Comprehensive benchmarking analysis shows our model's capacity to effectively capture gene function similarity across multiple modalities, outperforming state-of-the-art methods in gene representation learning by up to 97.5%. Moreover, we employ bioinformatics tools in conjunction with gene representations to uncover pathway enrichment, regulation causal networks, and functions of disease-associated or dosage-sensitive genes. Therefore, our model efficiently produces unified gene representations for the analysis of gene functions, tissue functions, diseases, and species evolution.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.52202/075280-1071

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Unlike ROI-level fusion of MV3D and AVOD, MVX-Net's VoxelFusion is voxel-level.

    “Unlike the ROI-level fusion of MV3D [5] and AVOD [71], the Vox-elFusion fusion strategy proposed in MVX-Net [79] is voxellevel.”
  • Early fusion methods such as MV3D and AVOD are generally attention-agnostic, relying on direct concatenation or feature pooling.

    “Early fusion methods, such as those used in MV3D [5] and AVOD [71], are generally attention-agnostic, relying on direct concatenation or feature pooling to combine multimodal data.”
  • AVOD designed a high-resolution feature extractor based on encoder-decoder structure.

    “To address this issue, AVOD [71] designed a high-resolution feature extractor based on an encoder-decoder structure.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, T., Wang, Y., Ying, R., & Zhao, H.
Venue
Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36
Published
2023
Pages
24661-24677
ISSN
1049-5258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7133214670
Cited by
15
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 1
FWCI
18.46
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • neural information processing systems (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Graph Neural Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
Keywords
graph neural networks, biological networks, gene function prediction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review