Cited by 6Topic ModelingDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningNatural Language Processing Techniques

Propagating Knowledge Updates to LMs Through Distillation

Open access
Padmanabhan, Shankar, Onoe, Yasumasa, Zhang, Michael, Durrett, Greg, Choi, Eunsol·2023·Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36

Abstract

Modern language models have the capacity to store and use immense amounts of knowledge about real-world entities, but it remains unclear how to update such knowledge stored in model parameters. While prior methods for updating knowledge in LMs successfully inject atomic facts, updated LMs fail to make inferences based on injected facts. In this work, we demonstrate that a context distillation-based approach can both impart knowledge about entities and propagate that knowledge to enable broader inferences. Our approach consists of two stages: transfer set generation and distillation on the transfer set. We first generate a transfer set by prompting a language model to generate continuations from the entity definition. Then, we update the model parameters so that the distribution of the LM (the student) matches the distribution of the LM conditioned on the definition (the teacher) on the transfer set. Our experiments demonstrate that this approach is more effective at propagating knowledge updates than fine-tuning and other gradient-based knowledge-editing methods. Moreover, it does not compromise performance in other contexts, even when injecting the definitions of up to 150 entities at once.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.52202/075280-2041

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Distillation techniques can internalize prompt- or context-dependent behaviors into model parameters by training a student to reproduce a prompted teacher's outputs.

    “Distillation techniques compress contextual knowledge into the parameters themselves. They can internalize prompt- or context-dependent behaviors into model parameters by training a student to reproduce a prompted teacher's outputs (e.g., prompt-to-weights or in-context distillation).”

    From A Survey of Agent Memory in the Second Half: Towards Self-Evolving and Long-Horizon Agents (2026) · cites this paper as Padmanabhan et al., 2023

  • Some distillation approaches optimize the model so it behaves as if a fixed prompt were implicitly present at inference time.

    “Concretely, some approaches optimize the model so it behaves as if a fixed prompt were implicitly present at inference time (Cao et al., 2025a; Padmanabhan et al., 2023).”

    From A Survey of Agent Memory in the Second Half: Towards Self-Evolving and Long-Horizon Agents (2026) · cites this paper as Padmanabhan et al., 2023

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. Amanda Askell, Yuntao Bai, Anna Chen, Dawn Drain, Deep Ganguli, Tom Henighan, Andy Jones, Nicholas Joseph, Ben Mann, Nova DasSarma, Nelson Elhage, Zac Hatfield-Dodds, Danny Hernandez, Jackson Kernion, Kamal Ndousse, Catherine Olsson, Dario Amodei, Tom Brown, Jack Clark, Sam McCandlish, Chris Olah, and Jared Kaplan. A General Language Assistant as a Laboratory for Alignment. arXiv eprint arxiv:2112.00861, 2021. · arXiv
  2. Taylor Berg-Kirkpatrick, David Burkett, and Dan Klein. An Empirical Investigation of Statistical Significance in NLP. In Proceedings of the 2012 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), 2012.
  3. Hanting Chen, Yunhe Wang, Chang Xu, Zhaohui Yang, Chuanjian Liu, Boxin Shi, Chunjing Xu, Chao Xu, and Qi Tian. Data-Free Learning of Student Networks. In International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2021.
  4. Eunbi Choi, Yongrae Jo, Joel Jang, and Minjoon Seo. Prompt Injection: Parameterization of Fixed Inputs. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL, 2023. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.11349. · arXiv
  5. Roi Cohen, Eden Biran, Ori Yoran, Amir Globerson, and Mor Geva. Evaluating the ripple effects of knowledge editing in language models. arXiv, 2023.
  6. Damai Dai, Li Dong, Yaru Hao, Zhifang Sui, and Furu Wei. Knowledge neurons in pre- trained transformers. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), abs/2104.08696, 2022. · arXiv
  7. Nicola De Cao, Wilker Aziz, and Ivan Titov. Editing Factual Knowledge in Language Models. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), 2021.
  8. Bhuwan Dhingra, Jeremy R. Cole, Julian Martin Eisenschlos, Daniel Gillick, Jacob Eisen- stein, and William W. Cohen. Time-Aware Language Models as Temporal Knowledge Bases. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics (TACL), 2021.
  9. Mor Geva, Roei Schuster, Jonathan Berant, and Omer Levy. Transformer feed-forward layers are key-value memories. In Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), 2021.
  10. Suchin Gururangan, Ana Marasović, Swabha Swayamdipta, Kyle Lo, Iz Beltagy, Doug Downey, and Noah A. Smith. Don't stop pretraining: Adapt language models to domains and tasks. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), abs/2004.10964, 2020. · arXiv
  11. Peter Hase, Mona Diab, Asli Celikyilmaz, Xian Li, Zornitsa Kozareva, Veselin Stoyanov, Mohit Bansal, and Srinivasan Iyer. Methods for measuring, updating, and visualizing factual beliefs in language models. In Proceedings of the 17th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 2714-2731, Dubrovnik, Croatia, May 2023. Association for Computational Linguistics. URL https://aclanthology.org/2023. eacl-main.199.
  12. Geoffrey E. Hinton, Oriol Vinyals, and Jeffrey Dean. Distilling the knowledge in a neural network. ArXiv, abs/1503.02531, 2015. · arXiv
  13. Jason Hoelscher-Obermaier, Julia Persson, Esben Kran, Ioannis Konstas, and Fazl Barez. Detecting edit failures in large language models: An improved specificity benchmark. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2023, pages 11548-11559, Toronto, Canada, July 2023. Association for Computational Linguistics. doi: 10.18653/v1/2023. findings-acl.733. URL https://aclanthology.org/2023.findings-acl.733. · DOI
  14. Ari Holtzman, Jan Buys, Li Du, Maxwell Forbes, and Yejin Choi. The Curious Case of Neural Text Degeneration. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2020.
  15. Xisen Jin, Dejiao Zhang, Henghui Zhu, Wei Xiao, Shang-Wen Li, Xiaokai Wei, Andrew Arnold, and Xiang Ren. Lifelong pretraining: Continually adapting language models to emerging corpora. In Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pages 4764- 4780, Seattle, United States, July 2022. Association for Computational Linguistics. URL https://aclanthology.org/2022.naacl-main.351.
  16. Jungo Kasai, Keisuke Sakaguchi, Yoichi Takahashi, Ronan Le Bras, Akari Asai, Xinyan Yu, Dragomir Radev, Noah A. Smith, Yejin Choi, and Kentaro Inui. RealTime QA: What's the Answer Right Now? arXiv eprint arxiv:2207.13332, 2022. · arXiv
  17. Angeliki Lazaridou, Adhiguna Kuncoro, Elena Gribovskaya, Devang Agrawal, Adam Liska, Tayfun Terzi, Mai Gimenez, Cyprien de Masson d'Autume, Tomas Kocisky, Sebastian Ruder, Dani Yogatama, Kris Cao, Susannah Young, and Phil Blunsom. Mind the Gap: Assessing Temporal Generalization in Neural Language Models. In Proceedings of Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2021.
  18. Kenton Lee, Kelvin Guu, Luheng He, Tim Dozat, and Hyung Won Chung. Neural Data Augmentation via Example Extrapolation. arXiv eprint arxiv:2102.01335, 2021. · arXiv
  19. Patrick Lewis, Ethan Perez, Aleksandara Piktus, Fabio Petroni, Vladimir Karpukhin, Naman Goyal, Heinrich Kuttler, Mike Lewis, Wen tau Yih, Tim Rocktäschel, Sebastian Riedel, and Douwe Kiela. Retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive nlp tasks. Proceedings of Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), abs/2005.11401, 2020. · arXiv
  20. Kevin Meng, David Bau, Alex Andonian, and Yonatan Belinkov. Locating and editing fac- tual knowledge in gpt. Proceedings of Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2022.
  21. Kevin Meng, David Bau, Alex Andonian, and Yonatan Belinkov. Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPT. In Proceedings of Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2022.
  22. Kevin Meng, Arnab Sen Sharma, Alex Andonian, Yonatan Belinkov, and David Bau. Mass- Editing Memory in a Transformer. In International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2023.
  23. Paul Micaelli and Amos Storkey. Zero-shot Knowledge Transfer via Adversarial Belief Match- ing. In Proceedings of Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2019.
  24. Eric Mitchell, Charles Lin, Antoine Bosselut, Chelsea Finn, and Christopher D Manning. Fast Model Editing at Scale. In International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2022.
  25. Eric Mitchell, Charles Lin, Antoine Bosselut, Chelsea Finn, and Christopher D. Manning. Memory-based model editing at scale. In International Conference on Machine Learning, 2022. URL https://arxiv.org/pdf/2206.06520.pdf. · arXiv
  26. Jesse Mu, Xiang Lisa Li, and Noah D. Goodman. Learning to compress prompts with gist tokens. ArXiv, abs/2304.08467, 2023. · arXiv
  27. Reiichiro Nakano, Jacob Hilton, Suchir Balaji, Jeff Wu, Long Ouyang, Christina Kim, Christo- pher Hesse, Shantanu Jain, Vineet Kosaraju, William Saunders, Xu Jiang, Karl Cobbe, Tyna Eloundou, Gretchen Krueger, Kevin Button, Matthew Knight, Benjamin Chess, and John Schulman. WebGPT: Browser-assisted question-answering with human feedback, 2022.
  28. Gaurav Kumar Nayak, Konda Reddy Mopuri, and Anirban Chakraborty. Effectiveness of Arbi- trary Transfer Sets for Data-free Knowledge Distillation. In Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), 2021. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.09113. · arXiv
  29. Yasumasa Onoe, Michael Zhang, Eunsol Choi, and Greg Durrett. Entity cloze by date: What LMs know about unseen entities. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: NAACL 2022, pages 693-702, Seattle, United States, July 2022. Association for Computational Linguistics. URL https://aclanthology.org/2022.findings-naacl.52.
  30. Yasumasa Onoe, Michael J.Q. Zhang, Shankar Padmanabhan, Greg Durrett, and Eunsol Choi. Can LMs Learn New Entities from Descriptions? Challenges in Propagating Injected Knowl- edge. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), 2023.
  31. Ori Ram, Yoav Levine, Itay Dalmedigos, Dor Muhlgay, Amnon Shashua, Kevin Leyton-Brown, and Yoav Shoham. In-context retrieval-augmented language models. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics (TACL), abs/2302.00083, 2023. · arXiv
  32. Weijia Shi, Sewon Min, Michihiro Yasunaga, Minjoon Seo, Rich James, Mike Lewis, Luke Zettlemoyer, and Wen tau Yih. Replug: Retrieval-augmented black-box language models. ArXiv, abs/2301.12652, 2023. · arXiv
  33. Anton Sinitsin, Vsevolod Plokhotnyuk, Dmitriy Pyrkin, Sergei Popov, and Artem Babenko. Editable Neural Networks. In International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2020.
  34. Charles Burton Snell, Dan Klein, and Ruiqi Zhong. Learning by distilling context. ArXiv, abs/2209.15189, 2022. · arXiv
  35. Hugo Touvron, Louis Martin, Kevin Stone, Peter Albert, Amjad Almahairi, Yasmine Babaei, Nikolay Bashlykov, Soumya Batra, Prajjwal Bhargava, Shruti Bhosale, Dan Bikel, Lukas Blecher, Cristian Canton Ferrer, Moya Chen, Guillem Cucurull, David Esiobu, Jude Fernandes, Jeremy Fu, Wenyin Fu, Brian Fuller, Cynthia Gao, Vedanuj Goswami, Naman Goyal, Anthony Hartshorn, Saghar Hosseini, Rui Hou, Hakan Inan, Marcin Kardas, Viktor Kerkez, Madian Khabsa, Isabel Kloumann, Artem Korenev, Punit Singh Koura, Marie-Anne Lachaux, Thibaut Lavril, Jenya Lee, Diana Liskovich, Yinghai Lu, Yuning Mao, Xavier Martinet, Todor Mihaylov, Pushkar Mishra, Igor Molybog, Yixin Nie, Andrew Poulton, Jeremy Reizenstein, Rashi Rungta, Kalyan Saladi, Alan Schelten, Ruan Silva, Eric Michael Smith, Ranjan Subramanian, Xiao- qing Ellen Tan, Binh Tang, Ross Taylor, Adina Williams, Jian Xiang Kuan, Puxin Xu, Zheng Yan, Iliyan Zarov, Yuchen Zhang, Angela Fan, Melanie Kambadur, Sharan Narang, Aurelien Rodriguez, Robert Stojnic, Sergey Edunov, and Thomas Scialom. Llama 2: Open foundation and fine-tuned chat models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.09288, 2023. · arXiv
  36. Peng Wang, Ningyu Zhang, Xin Xie, Yunzhi Yao, Bozhong Tian, Mengru Wang, Zekun Xi, Siyuan Cheng, Kangwei Liu, Guozhou Zheng, et al. Easyedit: An easy-to-use knowledge editing framework for large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.07269, 2023. · arXiv
  37. Jason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma, Ed Huai hsin Chi, F. Xia, Quoc Le, and Denny Zhou. Chain of thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models. ArXiv, abs/2201.11903, 2022. · arXiv
  38. Thomas Wolf, Lysandre Debut, Victor Sanh, Julien Chaumond, Clement Delangue, Anthony Moi, Pierric Cistac, Tim Rault, Rémi Louf, Morgan Funtowicz, Joe Davison, Sam Shleifer, Patrick von Platen, Clara Ma, Yacine Jernite, Julien Plu, Canwen Xu, Teven Le Scao, Sylvain Gugger, Mariama Drame, Quentin Lhoest, and Alexander M. Rush. Transformers: State-of- the-Art Natural Language Processing. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), 2020.
  39. Yan Xu, Mahdi Namazifar, Devamanyu Hazarika, Aishwarya Padmakumar, Yang Liu, and Dilek Hakkani-Tür. KILM: Knowledge Injection into Encoder-Decoder Language Models. ArXiv, abs/2302.09170, 2023. · arXiv
  40. Zexuan Zhong, Zhengxuan Wu, Christopher D Manning, Christopher Potts, and Danqi Chen. MQuAKE: Assessing knowledge editing in language models via multi-hop questions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.14795, 2023. · arXiv
  41. Chen Zhu, Ankit Singh Rawat, Manzil Zaheer, Srinadh Bhojanapalli, Daliang Li, Felix Yu, and Sanjiv Kumar. Modifying memories in transformer models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.00363, 2020. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Padmanabhan, S., Onoe, Y., Zhang, M., Durrett, G., & Choi, E.
Venue
Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36
Published
2023
Pages
47124-47142
ISSN
1049-5258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7133199932
Cited by
6
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2
FWCI
0.95
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • neural information processing systems (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (2145280, CAREER)
  • Cisco Systems
  • Open Philanthropy Project
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
Keywords
knowledge distillation, large language models, knowledge updating, knowledge dissemination, parameter-efficient fine-tuning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review