CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 100Generative Adversarial Networks and Image SynthesisMultimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsAdvanced Neural Network Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

T2I-CompBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Open-world Compositional Text-to-image Generation

Huang, Kaiyi, Sun, Kaiyue, Xie, Enze, Li, Zhenguo, Liu, Xihui·2023·Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36
DOI 10.52202/075280-3443
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.52202/075280-3443

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Huang, K., Sun, K., Xie, E., Li, Z., & Liu, X.
ORCID
Venue
Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36
Publisher
Neural Information Processing Systems Foundation, Inc. (NeurIPS)
Published
2023
Pages
78723-78747
ISSN
1049-5258 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.52202/075280-3443
OpenAlex
W7133231872
Cited by
100
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 70 · 2025: 30
FWCI
9.00
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
neural information processing systems (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
Keywords
text-to-image generation, compositional image generation, benchmark, image composition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review