Cited by 45Multimodal Machine Learning Applications3D Shape Modeling and AnalysisInteractive and Immersive Displays

Chat-Scene: Bridging 3D Scene and Large Language Models with Object Identifiers

Open access
Huang, Haifeng, Chen, Yilun, Wang, Zehan, Huang, Rongjie, Xu, Runsen, Wang, Tai, Liu, Luping, Cheng, Xize +3 more·2024·Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 37

Abstract

Recent advancements in 3D Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated promising capabilities for 3D scene understanding. However, previous methods exhibit deficiencies in general referencing and grounding capabilities for intricate scene comprehension. In this paper, we introduce the use of object identifiers and object-centric representations to interact with scenes at the object level. Specifically, we decompose the input 3D scene into a set of object proposals, each assigned a unique identifier token, which enables efficient object referencing and grounding during user-assistant interactions. Given the scarcity of scene-language data, we model the scene embeddings as a sequence of explicit object-level embeddings, derived from semantic-rich 2D or 3D representations. By employing object identifiers, we transform diverse 3D scene-language tasks into a unified question-answering format, facilitating joint training without the need for additional task-specific heads. With minimal fine-tuning on all downstream tasks, our model significantly outperforms existing methods on benchmarks including ScanRefer, Multi3DRefer, Scan2Cap, ScanQA, and SQA3D.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.52202/079017-3620

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Solutions to missing modalities are imputation-based and imputation-free; imputation-based methods recover missing data via matrix decomposition, graph learning, or GANs, while imputation-free methods use available modalities through latent representation learning and deep learning.

    “Solutions fall into imputation-based [302] and imputation-free methods [303].Imputation-based methods recover missing data via matrix decomposition, graph learning, or GANs, while imputation-free approaches leverage available modalities through latent representation learning and deep learning.”

    From Multimodal fusion and vision–language models: A survey for robot vision (2026) · cites this paper as [302]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 2 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 65

  1. P. Achlioptas, A. Abdelreheem, F. Xia, M. Elhoseiny, and L. Guibas. Referit3d: Neural listeners for fine-grained 3d object identification in real-world scenes. In Computer Vision-ECCV 2020: 16th European Conference, Glasgow, UK, August 23-28, 2020, Proceedings, Part I 16, pages 422-440. Springer, 2020.
  2. D. Azuma, T. Miyanishi, S. Kurita, and M. Kawanabe. Scanqa: 3d question answering for spatial scene understanding. In proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 19129-19139, 2022.
  3. D. Cai, L. Zhao, J. Zhang, L. Sheng, and D. Xu. 3djcg: A unified framework for joint dense captioning and visual grounding on 3d point clouds. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 16464-16473, 2022.
  4. D. Z. Chen, A. X. Chang, and M. Nießner. Scanrefer: 3d object localization in rgb-d scans using natural language. In European conference on computer vision, pages 202-221. Springer, 2020.
  5. J. Chen, W. Luo, X. Wei, L. Ma, and W. Zhang. Ham: Hierarchical attention model with high performance for 3d visual grounding. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.12513, 2, 2022. · arXiv
  6. S. Chen, X. Chen, C. Zhang, M. Li, G. Yu, H. Fei, H. Zhu, J. Fan, and T. Chen. Ll3da: Visual interactive instruction tuning for omni-3d understanding, reasoning, and planning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.18651, 2023. · arXiv
  7. S. Chen, P.-L. Guhur, M. Tapaswi, C. Schmid, and I. Laptev. Language conditioned spatial relation reasoning for 3d object grounding. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:20522-20535, 2022.
  8. S. Chen, H. Zhu, X. Chen, Y. Lei, G. Yu, and T. Chen. End-to-end 3d dense captioning with vote2cap- detr. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 11124-11133, 2023.
  9. S. Chen, H. Zhu, M. Li, X. Chen, P. Guo, Y. Lei, Y. Gang, T. Li, and T. Chen. Vote2cap-detr++: Decoupling localization and describing for end-to-end 3d dense captioning. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2024.
  10. Y. Chen, Z. Yu, Y. Chen, S. Lan, A. Anandkumar, J. Jia, and J. M. Alvarez. Focalformer3d: focusing on hard instance for 3d object detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 8394-8405, 2023.
  11. Z. Chen, A. Gholami, M. Nießner, and A. X. Chang. Scan2cap: Context-aware dense captioning in rgb-d scans. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 3193-3203, 2021.
  12. H. K. Cheng, S. W. Oh, B. Price, A. Schwing, and J.-Y. Lee. Tracking anything with decoupled video segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 1316-1326, 2023.
  13. A. Chowdhery, S. Narang, J. Devlin, M. Bosma, G. Mishra, A. Roberts, P. Barham, H. W. Chung, C. Sutton, S. Gehrmann, et al. Palm: Scaling language modeling with pathways. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.02311, 2022. · arXiv
  14. A. Dai, A. X. Chang, M. Savva, M. Halber, T. Funkhouser, and M. Nießner. Scannet: Richly-annotated 3d reconstructions of indoor scenes. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 5828-5839, 2017.
  15. R. Fu, J. Liu, X. Chen, Y. Nie, and W. Xiong. Scene-llm: Extending language model for 3d visual understanding and reasoning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.11401, 2024. · arXiv
  16. Z. Guo, R. Zhang, X. Zhu, Y. Tang, X. Ma, J. Han, K. Chen, P. Gao, X. Li, H. Li, et al. Point-bind & point-llm: Aligning point cloud with multi-modality for 3d understanding, generation, and instruction following. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.00615, 2023. · arXiv
  17. J. Han, R. Zhang, W. Shao, P. Gao, P. Xu, H. Xiao, K. Zhang, C. Liu, S. Wen, Z. Guo, et al. Imagebind-llm: Multi-modality instruction tuning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.03905, 2023. · arXiv
  18. Y. Hong, H. Zhen, P. Chen, S. Zheng, Y. Du, Z. Chen, and C. Gan. 3d-llm: Injecting the 3d world into large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.12981, 2023. · arXiv
  19. E. J. Hu, Y. Shen, P. Wallis, Z. Allen-Zhu, Y. Li, S. Wang, L. Wang, and W. Chen. Lora: Low-rank adaptation of large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.09685, 2021. · arXiv
  20. J. Huang, S. Yong, X. Ma, X. Linghu, P. Li, Y. Wang, Q. Li, S.-C. Zhu, B. Jia, and S. Huang. An embodied generalist agent in 3d world. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.12871, 2023. · arXiv
  21. P.-H. Huang, H.-H. Lee, H.-T. Chen, and T.-L. Liu. Text-guided graph neural networks for referring 3d instance segmentation. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 35, pages 1610-1618, 2021.
  22. S. Huang, Y. Chen, J. Jia, and L. Wang. Multi-view transformer for 3d visual grounding. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 15524-15533, 2022.
  23. A. Jain, N. Gkanatsios, I. Mediratta, and K. Fragkiadaki. Bottom up top down detection transformers for language grounding in images and point clouds. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 417-433. Springer, 2022.
  24. L. Jiang, H. Zhao, S. Shi, S. Liu, C.-W. Fu, and J. Jia. Pointgroup: Dual-set point grouping for 3d instance segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and Pattern recognition, pages 4867-4876, 2020.
  25. Y. Jiao, S. Chen, Z. Jie, J. Chen, L. Ma, and Y.-G. Jiang. More: Multi-order relation mining for dense captioning in 3d scenes. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 528-545. Springer, 2022.
  26. Z. Jin, M. Hayat, Y. Yang, Y. Guo, and Y. Lei. Context-aware alignment and mutual masking for 3d- language pre-training. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 10984-10994, 2023.
  27. M. Kolodiazhnyi, A. Vorontsova, A. Konushin, and D. Rukhovich. Oneformer3d: One transformer for unified point cloud segmentation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.14405, 2023. · arXiv
  28. X. Lai, Z. Tian, Y. Chen, Y. Li, Y. Yuan, S. Liu, and J. Jia. Lisa: Reasoning segmentation via large language model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.00692, 2023. · arXiv
  29. B. Li, Y. Zhang, L. Chen, J. Wang, J. Yang, and Z. Liu. Otter: A multi-modal model with in-context instruction tuning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.03726, 2023. · arXiv
  30. K. Li, Y. He, Y. Wang, Y. Li, W. Wang, P. Luo, Y. Wang, L. Wang, and Y. Qiao. Videochat: Chat-centric video understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.06355, 2023. · arXiv
  31. H. Liu, C. Li, Y. Li, and Y. J. Lee. Improved baselines with visual instruction tuning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.03744, 2023. · arXiv
  32. H. Liu, C. Li, Q. Wu, and Y. J. Lee. Visual instruction tuning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.08485, 2023. · arXiv
  33. J. Luo, J. Fu, X. Kong, C. Gao, H. Ren, H. Shen, H. Xia, and S. Liu. 3d-sps: Single-stage 3d visual grounding via referred point progressive selection. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 16454-16463, 2022.
  34. X. Ma, S. Yong, Z. Zheng, Q. Li, Y. Liang, S.-C. Zhu, and S. Huang. Sqa3d: Situated question answering in 3d scenes. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.07474, 2022. · arXiv
  35. R. OpenAI. Gpt-4 technical report. arxiv 2303.08774. View in Article, 2, 2023. · arXiv
  36. M. Oquab, T. Darcet, T. Moutakanni, H. Vo, M. Szafraniec, V. Khalidov, P. Fernandez, D. Haziza, F. Massa, A. El-Nouby, et al. Dinov2: Learning robust visual features without supervision. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.07193, 2023. · arXiv
  37. K. Papineni, S. Roukos, T. Ward, and W.-J. Zhu. Bleu: a method for automatic evaluation of machine translation. In Proceedings of the 40th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 311-318, 2002.
  38. M. Parelli, A. Delitzas, N. Hars, G. Vlassis, S. Anagnostidis, G. Bachmann, and T. Hofmann. Clip-guided vision-language pre-training for question answering in 3d scenes. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 5606-5611, 2023.
  39. J. Schult, F. Engelmann, A. Hermans, O. Litany, S. Tang, and B. Leibe. Mask3d: Mask transformer for 3d semantic instance segmentation. In 2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pages 8216-8223. IEEE, 2023.
  40. Y. Shen, Z. Geng, Y. Yuan, Y. Lin, Z. Liu, C. Wang, H. Hu, N. Zheng, and B. Guo. V-detr: Detr with vertex relative position encoding for 3d object detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.04409, 2023. · arXiv
  41. H. Touvron, T. Lavril, G. Izacard, X. Martinet, M.-A. Lachaux, T. Lacroix, B. Rozière, N. Goyal, E. Hambro, F. Azhar, et al. Llama: Open and efficient foundation language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.13971, 2023. · arXiv
  42. O. Unal, C. Sakaridis, S. Saha, F. Yu, and L. Van Gool. Three ways to improve verbo-visual fusion for dense 3d visual grounding. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.04561, 2023. · arXiv
  43. R. Vedantam, C. Lawrence Zitnick, and D. Parikh. Cider: Consensus-based image description evaluation. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 4566-4575, 2015.
  44. T. Vu, K. Kim, T. M. Luu, T. Nguyen, and C. D. Yoo. Softgroup for 3d instance segmentation on point clouds. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 2708-2717, 2022.
  45. Z. Wang, H. Huang, Y. Zhao, L. Li, X. Cheng, Y. Zhu, A. Yin, and Z. Zhao. 3drp-net: 3d relative position-aware network for 3d visual grounding. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.13363, 2023. · arXiv
  46. Z. Wang, H. Huang, Y. Zhao, L. Li, X. Cheng, Y. Zhu, A. Yin, and Z. Zhao. Distilling coarse-to-fine semantic matching knowledge for weakly supervised 3d visual grounding. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 2662-2671, 2023.
  47. Z. Wang, H. Huang, Y. Zhao, Z. Zhang, and Z. Zhao. Chat-3d: Data-efficiently tuning large language model for universal dialogue of 3d scenes. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.08769, 2023. · arXiv
  48. T.-Y. Wu, S.-Y. Huang, and Y.-C. F. Wang. Dora: 3d visual grounding with order-aware referring. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.16539, 2024. · arXiv
  49. Y. Wu, X. Cheng, R. Zhang, Z. Cheng, and J. Zhang. Eda: Explicit text-decoupling and dense alignment for 3d visual grounding. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 19231-19242, 2023.
  50. R. Xu, X. Wang, T. Wang, Y. Chen, J. Pang, and D. Lin. Pointllm: Empowering large language models to understand point clouds. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.16911, 2023. · arXiv
  51. J. Yang, X. Chen, S. Qian, N. Madaan, M. Iyengar, D. F. Fouhey, and J. Chai. Llm-grounder: Open- vocabulary 3d visual grounding with large language model as an agent. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.12311, 2023. · arXiv
  52. Z. Yang, S. Zhang, L. Wang, and J. Luo. Sat: 2d semantics assisted training for 3d visual grounding. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 1856-1866, 2021.
  53. Q. Ye, H. Xu, G. Xu, J. Ye, M. Yan, Y. Zhou, J. Wang, A. Hu, P. Shi, Y. Shi, et al. mplug-owl: Modularization empowers large language models with multimodality. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.14178, 2023. · arXiv
  54. Z. Yin, J. Wang, J. Cao, Z. Shi, D. Liu, M. Li, X. Huang, Z. Wang, L. Sheng, L. Bai, et al. Lamm: Language-assisted multi-modal instruction-tuning dataset, framework, and benchmark. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36, 2024.
  55. H. You, H. Zhang, Z. Gan, X. Du, B. Zhang, Z. Wang, L. Cao, S.-F. Chang, and Y. Yang. Ferret: Refer and ground anything anywhere at any granularity. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.07704, 2023. · arXiv
  56. Z. Yuan, X. Yan, Y. Liao, Y. Guo, G. Li, S. Cui, and Z. Li. X-trans2cap: Cross-modal knowledge transfer using transformer for 3d dense captioning. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 8563-8573, 2022.
  57. Z. Yuan, X. Yan, Y. Liao, R. Zhang, S. Wang, Z. Li, and S. Cui. Instancerefer: Cooperative holistic understanding for visual grounding on point clouds through instance multi-level contextual referring. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 1791-1800, 2021.
  58. D. Zhang, D. Liang, H. Yang, Z. Zou, X. Ye, Z. Liu, and X. Bai. Sam3d: Zero-shot 3d object detection via segment anything model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.02245, 2023. · arXiv
  59. H. Zhang, H. You, P. Dufter, B. Zhang, C. Chen, H.-Y. Chen, T.-J. Fu, W. Y. Wang, S.-F. Chang, Z. Gan, et al. Ferret-v2: An improved baseline for referring and grounding with large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.07973, 2024. · arXiv
  60. Y. Zhang, Z. Gong, and A. X. Chang. Multi3drefer: Grounding text description to multiple 3d objects. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 15225-15236, 2023.
  61. L. Zhao, D. Cai, L. Sheng, and D. Xu. 3dvg-transformer: Relation modeling for visual grounding on point clouds. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 2928-2937, 2021.
  62. Y. Zhao, Z. Lin, D. Zhou, Z. Huang, J. Feng, and B. Kang. Bubogpt: Enabling visual grounding in multi-modal llms. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.08581, 2023. · arXiv
  63. J. Zhou, J. Wang, B. Ma, Y.-S. Liu, T. Huang, and X. Wang. Uni3d: Exploring unified 3d representation at scale. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.06773, 2023. · arXiv
  64. D. Zhu, J. Chen, X. Shen, X. Li, and M. Elhoseiny. Minigpt-4: Enhancing vision-language understanding with advanced large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.10592, 2023. · arXiv
  65. Z. Zhu, X. Ma, Y. Chen, Z. Deng, S. Huang, and Q. Li. 3d-vista: Pre-trained transformer for 3d vision and text alignment. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 2911-2921, 2023.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huang, H., Chen, Y., Wang, Z., Huang, R., Xu, R., Wang, T., Liu, L., Cheng, X., Zhao, Y., Pang, J., & Zhao, Z.
Venue
Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 37
Published
2024
Pages
113991-114017
ISSN
1049-5258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4415795791
Cited by
45
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 10
FWCI
9.32
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • neural information processing systems (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Interactive and Immersive Displays
Keywords
3D scene understanding, large language models, object identifiers, chatbots, 3D scene description, human-robot interaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review