Cited by 12Artificial Intelligence in EducationEFL/ESL Teaching and LearningEnglish Language Learning and Teaching

Usability of ChatGPT in Second Language Acquisition: Capabilities, Effectiveness, Applications, Challenges, and Solutions

Open access
Li, Yiwen·2024·Studies in Applied Linguistics and TESOL

Abstract

In the realm of language acquisition, the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) presents a promising frontier. However, gaps exist in understanding the practical application of AI-driven tools, particularly in second language learning contexts. This study delves into the usability of ChatGPT, an advanced AI language model, within the domain of second language acquisition. This paper synthesizes existing literature on ChatGPT’s multifaceted capabilities, its effectiveness, its associated challenges, and the potential solutions to these challenges in language learning environments. This review demonstrates ChatGPT’s substantial potential in enhancing language learning outcomes, including fostering learner autonomy, improving motivation, and developing language proficiency. Yet, nuanced challenges such as preserving academic integrity and difficulties in crafting effective prompts emerge as crucial considerations. To address these issues, possible solutions including enhancing AI literacy among learners and educators are discussed. This paper sheds light on the complex dynamics of AI-assisted language education, urging ongoing research and refinement to fully utilize these technologies in enhancing second language learning.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.52214/salt.v24i1.12864

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In second language contexts, ChatGPT is frequently described as a source of accessible input, vocabulary expansion, and grammatical support, particularly for learners with limited confidence or exposure to proficient language models.

    “In second language contexts, ChatGPT is frequently described as a source of accessible input, vocabulary expansion, and grammatical support, particularly for learners with limited confidence or exposure to proficient language models [35].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 34 · Cited by 12

Authors
Li, Y.
Affiliations
Columbia University (US)
Corresponding author
Li, Yiwen
Venue
Studies in Applied Linguistics and TESOL
Published
2024-07-16
Volume
24
Issue
1
ISSN
2689-193X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4400685553
Cited by
12
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 1
FWCI
4.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Studies in Applied Linguistics and TESOL (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Columbia Academic Commons (Columbia University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › English Language Learning and Teaching
Keywords
ChatGPT, second language acquisition, AI-assisted language learning, usability, learner autonomy, student motivation, language proficiency, academic integrity, prompt engineering, AI literacy, large language models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review