The DOI matches its Crossref record.
CONVECTIVE DRYING OF KUMQUAT SLICES: COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT DRYING TEMPERATURES ON DRYING KINETICS, COLOUR, TOTAL PHENOLIC CONTENT AND ANTIOXIDANT CAPACITY
Open accessAbstract
This study was carried out to investigate the influences of different temperatures (50, 60, 70 and 80 °C) on the drying kinetics of kumquat slices. Additionally, quality attributes such as colour, total phenolic (TP) content and antioxidant capacity (ATC) of dried specimens at various temperatures in comparison with the fresh sample was determined. In accordance with the statistical findings of ten different thin layer modeling, Logarithmic at 50 °C and the Midilli et al. at 60, 70 and 80 °C models showed the best fit of the experimental data of the kumquat samples when compared to the other models. All colour parameters were changed and it was found that the samples dried at 50 °C had the closest colour values compared with the fresh sample (P<0.05). There was a decreasing in other quality attributes of dried samples compared to the untreated sample. Specifically, specimens drying at 70 ºC had the highest TP content and ATC among the samples dried at different temperatures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“phenolic compounds, due to their hydrogen-donating and electron-transfer abilities, are major contributors to radical scavenging activity”
From Influence of Extraction Parameters on Bioactive Compounds and Antimicrobial Activity of Banana Peel Using Ethanol-Water Solvent (2026) · cites this paper as İzli et al., 2018
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Rico, D., A.B. Martin-Diana, J.M. Barat and C. Barry- Ryan, "Extending and measuring the quality of fresh-cut fruit and vegetables: A review," Trends Food Sci. Technol., 18, 373-386 (2007).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
İmece, A. (2026) · Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology · doi:10.21597/jist.1745262
Metadata
- Authors
- IZLI, G., IZLI, N., TASKIN, O., & YILDIZ, G.
- Venue
- Latin American Applied Research - An international journal
- Published
- 2018-01-31
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 37-42
- ISSN
- 0327-0793 (ISSN-L)
- 1851-8796
- OpenAlex
- W3157585061
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 1.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Latin American Applied Research - An international journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Drying and Modeling
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Microencapsulation and Drying Processes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry (medical) › Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
- Keywords
- convective drying, drying temperature, drying kinetics, thin-layer drying models, Midilli model, logarithmic model, color change, total phenolic content, antioxidant capacity, dried fruit quality
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
