The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Clustered Pose and Nonlinear Appearance Models for Human Pose Estimation
Abstract
We investigate the task of 2D articulated human pose estimation in unconstrained still images. This is extremely challenging because of variation in pose, anatomy, clothing, and imaging conditions. Current methods use simple models of body part appearance and plausible configurations due to limitations of available training data and constraints on computational expense. We show that such models severely limit accuracy. Building on the successful pictorial structure model (PSM) we propose richer models of both appearance and pose, using state-of-the-art discriminative classifiers without introducing unacceptable computational expense. We introduce a new annotated database of challenging consumer images, an order of magnitude larger than currently available datasets, and demonstrate over 50 % relative improvement in pose estimation accuracy over a stateof-the-art method.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Histograms of Oriented Gradients for Human Detection
Dalal, N., & Triggs, B. (2005) · 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2005.177 · Cited by 33,584
A performance evaluation of local descriptors
Mikolajczyk, K., & Schmid, C. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2005.188 · Cited by 6,723
Cited by
Realtime Multi-person 2D Pose Estimation Using Part Affinity Fields
Cao, Z., Simon, T., Wei, S.-E., & Sheikh, Y. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.143 · Cited by 7,539
“The spatial model for articulated pose is either based on tree-structured graphical models [10, 30, 4, 3, 26, 40, 17], which parametrically encode the spatial relationship between adjacent parts following a kinematic chain, or non-tree models [37, 31, 20, 18, 8] that augment the tree structure with…”
MethodStacked Hourglass Networks for Human Pose Estimation
Newell, A., Yang, K., & Deng, J. (2016) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46484-8_29 · Cited by 5,634
OpenPose: Realtime Multi-Person 2D Pose Estimation Using Part Affinity Fields
Cao, Z., Hidalgo, G., Simon, T., Wei, S.-E., & Sheikh, Y. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2019.2929257 · Cited by 5,536
Wei, S.-E., Ramakrishna, V., Kanade, T., & Sheikh, Y. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.511 · Cited by 2,966
Deep learning for visual understanding: A review
Guo, Y., Liu, Y., Oerlemans, A., Lao, S., Wu, S., & Lew, M. S. (2016) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2015.09.116 · Cited by 2,504
Metadata
- Authors
- Johnson, S., & Everingham, M.
- Venue
- Procedings of the British Machine Vision Conference 2010
- Publisher
- British Machine Vision Association
- Published
- 2010
- Pages
- 12.1-12.11
- OpenAlex
- W2135533529
- Cited by
- 819
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.55
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
