The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
PatchMatch Stereo - Stereo Matching with Slanted Support Windows
Abstract
Common local stereo methods match support windows at integer-valued disparities. The implicit assumption that pixels within the support region have constant disparity does not hold for slanted surfaces and leads to a bias towards reconstructing fronto-parallel surfaces. This work overcomes this bias by estimating an individual 3D plane at each pixel onto which the support region is projected. The major challenge of this ap-proach is to find a pixel’s optimal 3D plane among all possible planes whose number is infinite. We show that an ideal algorithm to solve this problem is PatchMatch [1] that we extend to find an approximate nearest neighbor according to a plane. In addition to Patch-Match’s spatial propagation scheme, we propose (1) view propagation where planes are propagated among left and right views of the stereo pair and (2) temporal propagation where planes are propagated from preceding and consecutive frames of a video when doing temporal stereo. Adaptive support weights are used in matching cost aggregation to improve results at disparity borders. We also show that our slanted support windows can be used to compute a cost volume for global stereo methods, which allows for ex-plicit treatment of occlusions and can handle large untextured regions. In the results we demonstrate that our method reconstructs highly slanted surfaces and achieves impres-sive disparity details with sub-pixel precision. In the Middlebury table, our method is currently top-performer among local methods and takes rank 2 among approximately 110 competitors if sub-pixel precision is considered. 1
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fast approximate energy minimization via graph cuts
Boykov, Y., Veksler, O., & Zabih, R. (2001) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.969114 · Cited by 6,988
Cited by
A Multi-view Stereo Benchmark with High-Resolution Images and Multi-camera Videos
Schops, T., Schonberger, J. L., Galliani, S., Sattler, T., Schindler, K., Pollefeys, M., & Geiger, A. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.272 · Cited by 915
Differentiable Volumetric Rendering: Learning Implicit 3D Representations Without 3D Supervision
Niemeyer, M., Mescheder, L., Oechsle, M., & Geiger, A. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.00356 · Cited by 834
High-quality streamable free-viewpoint video
Collet, A., Chuang, M., Sweeney, P., Gillett, D., Evseev, D., Calabrese, D., Hoppe, H., Kirk, A., & Sullivan, S. (2015) · ACM Transactions on Graphics · doi:10.1145/2766945 · Cited by 573
Fast cost-volume filtering for visual correspondence and beyond
Rhemann, C., Hosni, A., Bleyer, M., Rother, C., & Gelautz, M. (2011) · CVPR 2011 · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2011.5995372 · Cited by 485
Self-citationPatchmatchNet: Learned Multi-View Patchmatch Stereo
Wang, F., Galliani, S., Vogel, C., Speciale, P., & Pollefeys, M. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.01397 · Cited by 420
Metadata
- Authors
- Bleyer, M., Rhemann, C., & Rother, C.
- Venue
- Procedings of the British Machine Vision Conference 2011
- Publisher
- British Machine Vision Association
- Published
- 2011
- Pages
- 14.1-14.11
- OpenAlex
- W1964057156
- Cited by
- 736
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 18.89
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: PatchMatch Stereo - Stereo Matching with Slanted Support Windows. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5244/c.25.14
- The paper
- Bleyer, M., Rhemann, C., & Rother, C. (2011). PatchMatch Stereo - Stereo Matching with Slanted Support Windows. Procedings of the British Machine Vision Conference 2011. https://doi.org/10.5244/c.25.14
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.