The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
Abstract
DOAJ is a unique search service for fully Open Access (OA) (no embargo) peer-reviewed scholarly journals, featuring options to include article or journal level metadata in other library search services. DOAJ’s over 9,000 journals represents about 27% of the world’s scholarly peer-reviewed journals, up from 10% in 2007, and the article-level search encompasses about 10% of global scholarly journal article production. All academic disciplines are represented; some (notably medicine), more so than others. With 128 countries and many languages represented, DOAJ is diverse and inclusive. DOAJ has a well-designed, clean, attractive, easy-to-use search interface. Suggestions for improvement include more reader-friendly organisation, and results-level metadata export for journals and articles. ADA compliance checking is currently in progress. DOAJ’s application form is long and complex and could benefit from streamlining. DOAJ is the premium venue for authors seeking quality Open Access journals to publish in. Its value for finding academic material is strong and growing. It is also a must-have for libraries. DOAJ membership for libraries, while optional, is of value to libraries for local OA promotion as well as promotion of the library through DOAJ’s popular website.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“According to its publishers, it is an open access journal, but its ISSN does not appear in the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) [6].”
From False authorship: an explorative case study around an AI-generated article published under my name (2025) · cites this paper as [6]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Morrison, Heather. 2016. "Dramatic Growth of Open Access Sep- tember 2016." The Imaginary Journal of Poetic Economics. Accessed Nov. 15, 2016 from <http://poeticeconomics.blogspot.ca/2016/10/ dramatic-growth-of-open-access.html>
- Stenson, L (2012). "Why all these directories? An introduc- tion to DOAJ and DOAB." Insights, 2012, 25(3), 251-256, doi: 10.1629/2048-7754.25.3.251. Available at <http://dx.doi. org/10.1629/2048-7754.25.3.251> Ware, Mark and Michael Mabe. 2015. The STM Report: an Overview of Scientific and Scholarly Journal Publishing. Fourth Edition. The Hague: International Association of Scientific, Technical and Medi- cal Publishers. · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
False authorship: an explorative case study around an AI-generated article published under my name
Spinellis, D. (2025) · Research Integrity and Peer Review · doi:10.1186/s41073-025-00165-z · Cited by 37
Metadata
- Authors
- Morrison, H.
- Venue
- The Charleston Advisor
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2017-01-01
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 25-28
- ISSN
- 1525-4011
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
