Effect of shift work on body mass index and metabolic parameters
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this cohort study was to investigate the effects of shift work on changes in parameters related to metabolic disturbances. METHODS: The study population included 1529 male blue-collar workers, aged 19-49 years at baseline, working in a sash and zipper factory in Japan. The participants were divided into four groups according to the work schedule at baseline, the end point being workers doing fixed daytime work in both years (day-day), workers who changed from shift work to fixed daytime work (shift-day), workers who changed from fixed daytime work to shift work (day-shift), and workers doing shift work in both years (shift-shift). The changes in body mass index (BMI), blood pressure, serum cholesterol, and glycosylated hemoglobin A1c over a period of 10 years were compared among the groups by work schedule. RESULTS: The age-adjusted mean increase in BMI was 1.03 kg/m(2) for the day-shift workers, and it was significantly larger than that of the day-day workers and shift-day workers. The shift-shift workers showed a significantly larger increase in BMI than the day-day workers. These tendencies remained after adjustment for age and all other confounding factors, such as BMI, smoking, drinking, and leisure-time physical activity at baseline. The increase in total cholesterol tended to be higher among the shift-shift workers and the day-shift workers, but there were no significant differences. Blood pressure and hemoglobin A1c did not differ among the four groups. CONCLUSIONS: Shift work is considered to be a risk factor for excess weight. However, no significant difference in the biomarkers was found between daytime workers and shift workers.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Night shift workers tend to have significantly higher BMI and greater waist-to-hip ratio than day shift workers.
“Indeed, night shift workers tend to have significantly higher body mass index (BMI) and greater waist-to-hip ratio than day shift workers [22,23,24].”
From Shift Work: Disrupted Circadian Rhythms and Sleep—Implications for Health and Well-being (2017) · cites this paper as [22]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 21 · Cited by 194
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Bøggild H, Knutsson A. Shift work, risk factors and car- diovascular disease [review]. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1999;25(2):85-99.
- Kristensen TS. Cardiovascular disease and the work envi- ronment: a critical review of the epidemiologic literature on nonchemical factors [review]. Scand J Work Environ. 1989;15:165-75.
- Theorell T, Åkerstedt T. Day and night work: changes in cholesterol, uric acid, glucose and potassium in serum and in circadian patterns. Acta Med Scand. 1976;200:47-53.
- Authors
- Morikawa, Y., Nakagawa, H., Miura, K., Soyama, Y., Ishizaki, M., Kido, T., Naruse, Y., Suwazono, Y., & Nogawa, K.
- Affiliations
- Kanazawa Medical University (JP)
- Kanazawa University (JP)
- Chiba University (JP)
- Venue
- Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health
- Published
- 2007-02
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 45-50
- ISSN
- 0355-3140 (ISSN-L)
- 1795-990X
- OpenAlex
- W1978121138
- Cited by
- 194
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 14.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment & Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
- Keywords
- shift work, body mass index, metabolic disorders, weight gain, blood pressure, serum cholesterol, HbA1c, work schedules, blue-collar workers, industrial workers, occupational health
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Blood Pressure, Cholesterol, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Japan, Male, Middle Aged, Personnel Staffing and Scheduling, Work Schedule Tolerance, Cohort Studies, Biomarkers, Health Behavior, Body Mass Index
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review