The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Eye discomfort and work with visual display terminals.
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the relationships between eye discomfort symptoms and work with visual display terminals among routine office workers. METHODS: Three hundred and twenty-seven office workers and their work stations were investigated by means of questionnaires and worksite investigations. The data were subjected to multivariate logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: The occurrence of eye discomfort increased as the extent of VDT work increased, as did the specific symptoms of sensitivity to light and smarting, gritting feeling, or redness. The use of spectacles during visual display terminal work, age, stomach stress reaction, distances between the eye and different visual task objects, as well as the vertical position of the terminal also influenced certain symptoms. Having (i) the terminal at about eye level during prolonged terminal work, (ii) using monofocal glasses during terminal work in situations with large distance variations to visual task objects, or (iii) being elderly with prolonged terminal work and reporting stomach stress all led to increased odds ratios for certain eye discomfort symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a visual display terminal in routine office work is associated with an increased occurrence of certain eye discomfort symptoms. This association is affected also by the presence of certain other individual and ergonomic factors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Health complaints, stress, and distress: Exploring the central role of negative affectivity.
Watson, D., & Pennebaker, J. W. (1989) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.96.2.234 · Cited by 3,030
Cited by
Korhonen, T., Ketola, R., Toivonen, R., Luukkonen, R., Häkkänen, M., & Viikari-Juntura, E. (2003) · Occupational and Environmental Medicine · doi:10.1136/oem.60.7.475 · Cited by 347
Szeto, G. P. Y., Straker, L. M., & O’Sullivan, P. B. (2005) · Manual Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.math.2005.01.004 · Cited by 261
Serra, G., Lo Scalzo, L., Giuffrè, M., Ferrara, P., & Corsello, G. (2021) · Italian Journal of Pediatrics · doi:10.1186/s13052-021-01102-8 · Cited by 219
Bako-Biro, Z., Wargocki, P., Weschler, C. J., & Fanger, P. O. (2004) · Indoor Air · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0668.2004.00218.x · Cited by 180
Media Use during Adolescence: The Recommendations of the Italian Pediatric Society
Bozzola, E., Spina, G., Ruggiero, M., Vecchio, D., Caruso, C., Bozzola, M., Staiano, A. M., Agostiniani, R., Del Vecchio, A., Banderali, G., et al. (2019) · Italian Journal of Pediatrics · doi:10.1186/s13052-019-0725-8 · Cited by 65
Metadata
- Authors
- Bergqvist, U. O., & Knave, B. G.
- Venue
- Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health
- Published
- 1994-02
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 27-33
- ISSN
- 0355-3140 (ISSN-L)
- 1795-990X
- OpenAlex
- W2074686009
- Cited by
- 171
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Eye discomfort and work with visual display terminals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5271/sjweh.1432
- The paper
- Bergqvist, U. O., & Knave, B. G. (1994). Eye discomfort and work with visual display terminals. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.1432
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.