The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Supplement
Open accessAbstract
Although many hypotheses have been suggested in the last few decades about possible underlying mechanisms for the development of nonspecific musculoskeletal symptoms in particular and (chronic) pain in general, definitive knowledge is still lacking.One wellknown potential mechanism at the muscular level is the Cinderella hypothesis, namely, that the lack of recovery from repeated recruitment of the same motor units is responsible for fatigue and complaints when the same movements and forces are asked for in a repetitive manner.Interested readers are referred to, for example, the reports of Hagberg & Wegman ( 8), Johansson & Sojka (17), Armstrong et al (9), Wright (18), Main & Watson (19), and Bushnell & Cobo-Castro (20).Taken together, the aforementioned problems make it difficult to compare the results of different epidemiologic studies, surveillance systems, and registration databases.This difficulty hampers efforts to assess and compare the magnitude and nature of WRUEMSD within and across different countries, geographic areas, industries, workplaces, and occupational groups over time.Similarly, it impedes the ability to assess the effectiveness of different types of medical and workplace intervention.Current problems • • •
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Diversity and variation in biomechanical exposure: What is it, and why would we like to know?
Mathiassen, S. E. (2006) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2006.04.006 · Cited by 326
Nordander, C., Ohlsson, K., Åkesson, I., Arvidsson, I., Balogh, I., Hansson, G.-Å., Strömberg, U., Rittner, R., & Skerfving, S. (2013) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2012.07.009 · Cited by 97
Herquelot, E., Bodin, J., Roquelaure, Y., Ha, C., Leclerc, A., Goldberg, M., Zins, M., & Descatha, A. (2013) · American Journal of Industrial Medicine · doi:10.1002/ajim.22140 · Cited by 91
Effects of office innovation on office workers' health and performance
Meijer, E. M., Frings-Dresen, M. H. W., & Sluiter, J. K. (2009) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140130902842752 · Cited by 88
Self-citationDescatha, A., Albo, F., Leclerc, A., Carton, M., Godeau, D., Roquelaure, Y., Petit, A., & Aublet‐Cuvelier, A. (2016) · Arthritis Care & Research · doi:10.1002/acr.22874 · Cited by 77
Metadata
- Authors
- Sluiter, J. K., Rest, K. M., & HW Frings-Dresen, M. H.
- Venue
- Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health
- Published
- 2001
- Volume
- 27
- Pages
- 1-102
- ISSN
- 0355-3140 (ISSN-L)
- 1795-990X
- OpenAlex
- W4293758428
- Cited by
- 364
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Supplement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5271/sjweh.637
- The paper
- Sluiter, J. K., Rest, K. M., & HW Frings-Dresen, M. H. (2001). Supplement. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.637
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.