The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effects of ergonomic intervention in work with video display units
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the effect of an intensive ergonomic approach and education on workstation changes and musculoskeletal disorders among workers who used a video display unit (VDU). METHODS: A randomized controlled design was used. The subjects (N=124) were allocated into three groups (intensive ergonomics, ergonomic education, reference) using stratified random sampling. The evaluation involved questionnaires, a diary of discomfort, measurements of workload, and an ergonomic rating of the workstations. The assessments were made 2 weeks before the intervention and after 2 and 10 months of follow-up. RESULTS: The intensive and training groups showed less musculoskeletal discomfort than the reference group after 2 months of follow-up. Positive effects on discomfort were seen primarily for the shoulder, neck, and upper back areas. No significant differences were found for the strain levels or prevalence of pain. After the intervention the ergonomic level was distinctly higher in the intensive ergonomic group than in the education or reference group. CONCLUSIONS: Both the intensive ergonomics approach and education in ergonomics help reduce discomfort in VDU work. In attempts to improve the physical ergonomics of VDU workstations, the best result will be achieved with cooperative planning in which both workers and practitioners are actively involved.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials: The CONSORT Statement
Begg, C. (1996) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1996.03540080059030 · Cited by 3,127
Cited by
Ergonomics, musculoskeletal disorders and computer work
Wahlström, J. (2005) · Occupational Medicine · doi:10.1093/occmed/kqi083 · Cited by 422
Korhonen, T., Ketola, R., Toivonen, R., Luukkonen, R., Häkkänen, M., & Viikari-Juntura, E. (2003) · Occupational and Environmental Medicine · doi:10.1136/oem.60.7.475 · Cited by 347
Self-citationHakala, P. T., Rimpelä, A. H., Saarni, L. A., & Salminen, J. J. (2006) · European Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckl025 · Cited by 337
Van Eerd, D., Munhall, C., Irvin, E., Rempel, D., Brewer, S., van der Beek, A. J., Dennerlein, J. T., Tullar, J., Skivington, K., Pinion, C., et al. (2016) · Occupational and Environmental Medicine · doi:10.1136/oemed-2015-102992 · Cited by 334
Effectiveness of participatory ergonomic interventions on health outcomes: a systematic review
Rivilis, I., Van Eerd, D., Cullen, K., Cole, D. C., Irvin, E., Tyson, J., & Mahood, Q. (2008) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2007.08.006 · Cited by 326
Metadata
- Authors
- Ketola, R., Toivonen, R., Häkkänen, M., Luukkonen, R., Takala, E.-P., Viikari-Juntura, E., & the Expert Group of Ergonomics
- Venue
- Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health
- Published
- 2002-02
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 18-24
- ISSN
- 0355-3140 (ISSN-L)
- 1795-990X
- OpenAlex
- W2026450045
- Cited by
- 208
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of ergonomic intervention in work with video display units. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5271/sjweh.642
- The paper
- Ketola, R., Toivonen, R., Häkkänen, M., Luukkonen, R., Takala, E.-P., Viikari-Juntura, E., & the Expert Group of Ergonomics. (2002). Effects of ergonomic intervention in work with video display units. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.642
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.