The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Trends in the Danish work environment in 1990-2000 and their associations with labor-force changes
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were (i) to describe the trends in the work environment in 1990-2000 among employees in Denmark and (ii) to establish whether these trends were attributable to labor-force changes. METHODS: The split-panel design of the Danish Work Environment Cohort Study includes interviews with three cross-sections of 6067, 5454, and 5404 employees aged 18-59 years, each representative of the total Danish labor force in 1990, 1995 and 2000. In the cross-sections, the participation rate decreased over the period (90% in 1990, 80% in 1995, 76% in 2000). The relative differences in participation due to gender, age, and region did not change noticeably. RESULTS: Jobs with decreasing prevalence were clerks, cleaners, textile workers, and military personnel. Jobs with increasing prevalence were academics, computer professionals, and managers. Intense computer use, long workhours, and noise exposure increased. Job insecurity, part-time work, kneeling work posture, low job control, and skin contact with cleaning agents decreased. Labor-force changes fully explained the decline in low job control and skin contact to cleaning agents and half of the increase in long workhours, but not the other work environment changes. CONCLUSIONS: The work environment of Danish employees improved from 1990 to 2000, except for increases in long workhours and noise exposure. From a specific work environment intervention point of view, the development has been less encouraging because declines in low job control, as well as skin contact to cleaning agents, were explained by labor-force changes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Kristensen, T. S., Hannerz, H., Høgh, A., & Borg, V (2005) · Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health · doi:10.5271/sjweh.948 · Cited by 1,430
Self-citationRugulies, R., Bültmann, U., Aust, B., & Burr, H. (2006) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwj119 · Cited by 299
Self-citationSusitaival, P., Flyvholm, M. ‐., Meding, B., Kanerva, L., Lindberg, M., Svensson, Å., & Ólafsson, J. H. (2003) · Contact Dermatitis · doi:10.1111/j.0105-1873.2003.00159.x · Cited by 289
Metadata
- Authors
- Burr, H., Bjorner, J. B., Kristensen, T. S., Tüchsen, F., & Bach, E.
- Venue
- Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health
- Published
- 2003-08
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 270-279
- ISSN
- 0355-3140 (ISSN-L)
- 1795-990X
- OpenAlex
- W2064080025
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Trends in the Danish work environment in 1990-2000 and their associations with labor-force changes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5271/sjweh.731
- The paper
- Burr, H., Bjorner, J. B., Kristensen, T. S., Tüchsen, F., & Bach, E. (2003). Trends in the Danish work environment in 1990-2000 and their associations with labor-force changes. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.731
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.