Perbandingan Kandungan Selulosa dan Lignin dari Kayu Acacia crassicarpa dan Acacia mangium
Open accessAbstract
The development of the pulp & paper industries in Indonesia increase every year. To support the development of industries in Indonesia in order to be able to compete with similar industries from abroad, it is very important to pay attention to the quality of the paper produced. One way to determine the quality of the pulp & paper is by knowing the chemical composition and area where the wood grows. Important chemical compositions that can support the strength of wood and paper quality include cellulose and lignin. Therefore, this study was conducted to compare the levels of cellulose and lignin contained in Acacia crassicarpa wood from wetlands and Acacia mangium from dry land which is processed into pulp & paper with good quality. Determination of cellulose and lignin content in wood was carried out using the gravimetric method. Test results on Acacia crassicarpa wood species from wetlands obtained cellulose content of 55.48% and lignin 24.13%, while in Acacia mangium wood from dry land obtained cellulose content of 51.46% and lignin 27.66%. According to company standards that levels of cellulose and lignin in two different fields are obtained according to the standards set by the company. So for the results of testing Acacia crassicarpa wood from wetlands have the highest levels of cellulose with low levels of lignin
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cellulose content in A. crassicarpa ranges from 43.33% to 48.62%.
“The cellulose content in A. crassicarpa ranges from 43.33% to 48.62%, and 41.48% in eucalyptus hybrid [12].”
From Enhancing dissolving pulp quality of mixed raw materials through pre-hydrolysis kraft-cooking: A study on Acacia crassicarpa and Terminalia catappa (2024) · cites this paper as [12]
The Results and Discussion and Conclusion report 55.48% cellulose in A. crassicarpa, which is outside the attributed range of 43.33%–48.62%. The cited paper therefore gives a contrary value for the claimed species. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cellulose content in eucalyptus hybrid is 41.48%.
“The cellulose content in A. crassicarpa ranges from 43.33% to 48.62%, and 41.48% in eucalyptus hybrid [12].”
From Enhancing dissolving pulp quality of mixed raw materials through pre-hydrolysis kraft-cooking: A study on Acacia crassicarpa and Terminalia catappa (2024) · cites this paper as [12]
The Methods and Results sections examine Acacia crassicarpa and Acacia mangium, reporting cellulose contents of 55.48% and 51.46%, respectively; no page numbers are available in our copy. Searches for “eucalyptus hybrid 41.48%” and “43.33% to 48.62% eucalyptus” found no passage about eucalyptus or its cellulose content. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Untuk Bahan Baku Pulp. Jurnal Pemuliaan Tanaman Hutan Vol. 9, No.1, 2015, pp. 53-60.
- Heru S., Wibisono, Jasni & Wa Ode Muliastuty Arsyad. Komposisi Kimia Dan Keawetan Alami Delapan Jenis Kayu Di Bawah Naungan. Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol. 36 No.1, Bogor : 2018, pp. 59-65.
- Bahri, Syamsul. Pembuatan Pulp dari Batang Pisang. Jurnal Teknologi Kimia Unimal 4:2, November 2015, pp. 36-50.
- Fengel, D & Wegener, G. Wood Chemistry, Ultrastructure, Reactions, Sastrohamidjojo, H, (penerjemah): Prawirohatmodjo, S. (penyuting). 1995. Kayu: Kimia, Ultrastruktur, Reaksi-Reaksi. UGM Press. Yogyakarta.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sahan, Y., Rahmi, S. W., Evelyn, Herman, S., Chairul, Khairat, Ohi, H., & Amri, A. (2024) · Communications in Science and Technology · doi:10.21924/cst.9.2.2024.1519 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Putri, M., & Poeni, S.
- Affiliations
- Politeknik ATI Padang (ID)
- Venue
- REACTOR: Journal of Research on Chemistry and Engineering
- Publisher
- Politeknik ATI Padang
- Published
- 2020-06-30
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 12
- ISSN
- 2746-0401 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3193347172
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 0.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-sa
- Locations
- REACTOR Journal of Research On Chemistry And Engineering (publishedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Lignin and Wood Chemistry
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Wood Treatment and Properties
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Advanced Cellulose Research Studies
- Keywords
- cellulose content, lignin content, Acacia crassicarpa, Acacia mangium, wood chemistry, paper strength
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
