Cited by 70Artificial Intelligence in EducationEducational Innovations and TechnologyEducation in Diverse Contexts

Digital Divide in AI-Powered Education: Challenges and Solutions for Equitable Learning

Open access
Lourdu Vesna·2025·Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Management

Abstract

The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in education has transformed teaching methodologies, personalized learning experiences, and improved student engagement. However, this advancement has also exacerbated the digital divide, creating disparities in access to AI-powered educational tools. This review explores the challenges associated with the digital divide in AI-driven education, including technological infrastructure gaps, socio-economic barriers, digital literacy deficiencies, and policy constraints. It further examines the disproportionate impact on marginalized communities, rural populations, and underfunded educational institutions, limiting their ability to benefit from AI-enhanced learning. To address these inequities, various solutions are proposed, including increased investment in digital infrastructure, the development of affordable AI-based learning tools, and the implementation of inclusive policies that prioritize equitable access to technology. The role of public-private partnerships, government interventions, and AI-driven adaptive learning models in bridging this gap is also analyzed. Additionally, fostering digital literacy through teacher training programs and community initiatives is highlighted as a critical strategy to ensure inclusive adoption of AI in education. This paper emphasizes that while AI has the potential to revolutionize learning experiences, its benefits must be universally accessible. The study underscores the need for a multi-stakeholder approach involving policymakers, educators, technologists, and social organizations to create a more equitable AI-powered educational ecosystem. Future research directions are recommended to explore innovative frameworks that mitigate the digital divide, ensuring AI-driven education is inclusive and accessible to all learners, regardless of their socio-economic backgrounds.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.52783/jisem.v10i21s.3327

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Students from rural and low-income backgrounds encounter challenges such as restricted device availability and intermittent internet connectivity, while those from higher-income households and urban settings report better exposure to AI technologies and improved digital competencies.

    “Students from rural and lowincome backgrounds encounter challenges such restricted device availability and intermittent internet connectivity, while those from higher-income households and urban settings report better exposure to AI technologies and improved digital competencies (Vesna, 2025).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vesna, L.
Venue
Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Management
Published
2025-03-14
Volume
10
Issue
21s
Pages
300-308
ISSN
2468-4376 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4408675485
Cited by
70
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 46 · 2025: 24
FWCI
44.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Information Systems Engineering & Management (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Innovations and Technology
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education in Diverse Contexts
Keywords
digital divide, artificial intelligence in education, educational equity, access to AI tools, digital literacy, socioeconomic barriers, rural education, marginalized communities, digital infrastructure, public-private partnerships, adaptive learning, teacher professional development, inclusive education policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review