Cited by 8Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchResilience and Mental HealthGrief, Bereavement, and Mental Health

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

The relationship between coping styles and posttraumatic growth and posttraumatic trauma level after Kahramanmaraş Earthquake

Open access
Ciller, Alpay, Kafes, Ali Yasin, Dundar, Ayse Hazal, Sakiroglu, Mehmet·2023·Journal of Social and Educational Research

Abstract

Earthquakes, like many other disasters, can cause loss of life, injuries, loss of home, loss of loved ones and unemployment. The prevalence rate of PTSD after natural disasters has been reported to be 10 to 15%. The aim of this study is to examine whether the level of post-earthquake trauma and post-traumatic growth and ways of coping with stress differ between individuals who directly and indirectly experienced the earthquake. In line with this purpose, the sample of the study consists of 33 people between the ages of 17-72 (Mean=38.0, SD=12.0) who were directly affected by the earthquakes with the epicentre of Kahramanmaraş on February 6, 2023 and 55 participants between the ages of 14-72 (Mean=39.0, SD=13.9) who did not experience an earthquake but were indirectly exposed to the effects of the earthquake through television and social media. Data were collected and analysed through Socio-Demographic Information Form, Posttraumatic Growth Inventory, Scale for Determining the Level of Post-Earthquake Trauma and Ways of Coping Scale. In our study, in accordance with the literature, it was determined that people who directly experienced the earthquake showed higher trauma levels than people who experienced it indirectly. Another finding in parallel with this is that helplessness scores were found to be higher in people who were directly exposed to the earthquake than those who were indirectly exposed to the earthquake. It is thought that the findings may provide useful information for practitioners to regulate the psychological effects of future earthquakes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.5281/zenodo.10444516

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ciller, A., Kafes, A. Y., Dundar, A. H., & Sakiroglu, M.
Affiliations
  • Gaziosmanpaşa University
  • Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi (TR)
  • Usak University
  • Adnan Menderes University
Venue
Journal of Social and Educational Research
Publisher
Journal of Social and Educational Research
Published
2023-12-30
ISSN
2980-0676 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W6948472731
Cited by
8
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2
FWCI
2.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Social and Educational Research (cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
Keywords
coping styles, posttraumatic growth, post-traumatic stress, Kahramanmaraş earthquakes, earthquake survivors, media exposure, helplessness, natural disasters, psychological impact of disasters

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review