Elaboración colectiva de la versión 2.0 de la Gobernanza Comunitaria de MetaDocencia
Open accessAbstract
Documentos relacionados al proceso de construcción colectiva de la versión 2.0 de la Gobernanza comunitaria de MetaDocencia. Incluye: Presentación final Graduación Open Seeds OLS-8 Pautas de Convivencia 2024 Protocolo de Intervención del Equipo de Pautas de Convivencia (PdC) de MetaDocencia MetaDocencia Conflict of Interest Policy Versión editable del formulario "MetaDocencia: Declaración de Conflictos de Interés" Pautas de Autoría de MetaDocencia MetaDocencia Authorship Guidelines
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
No citation lists for this paper
- Authors
- Iarussi, E., Mercado-Lara, E., Poggio, I. G., Ación, L., Ascenzi, L., Sharan, M., Palopoli, N., Lefer, P., Pendino, R., Xhardez, V., & Alonso, M.
- Affiliations
- MetaDocencia
- ORCID
- Venue
- Zenodo
- Publisher
- Zenodo
- Published
- 2024-06-24
- OpenAlex
- W6911269101
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- es
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Open Education and E-Learning
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Publishing and Scholarly Communication
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Practises and Engagement
- Keywords
- MetaDocencia, community governance, collective development, conflict of interest policies, coexistence rules, open educational resources, open science
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
