The DOI matches its DataCite record.
EcologicalNetworks.jl - analysing ecological networks of species interactions
Abstract
Networks are a convenient way to represent many interactions among ecological entities. The analysis of ecological networks is challenging for two reasons. First, there is a plethora of measures that can be applied (and some of them measure the same property); second, the implementation of these measures is sometimes difficult . We present EcologicalNetworks.jl , a package for the julia programming language. Using a layered system of types to represent several types of ecological networks, this packages offers a solid library of basic functions which can be chained together to perform the most common analyses of ecological networks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Julia is already being used by ecologists to model ecological networks and bioenergetic food webs.
“Julia is already being used by ecologists to model ecological networks [Poisot and Bélisle, 2018] and bioenergetic food webs [Delmas et al., 2019], and will continue to enable advances in other areas of computational ecology.”
From Circuitscape in Julia: High Performance Connectivity Modelling to Support Conservation Decisions (2020) · cites this paper as Poisot and Bélisle, 2018
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Circuitscape in Julia: High Performance Connectivity Modelling to Support Conservation Decisions
(2020) · JuliaCon Proceedings · doi:10.21105/jcon.00058 · Cited by 163
Metadata
- Authors
- Poisot, T., Bélisle, Z., Hoebeke, L., Stock, M., & Szefer, P.
- Affiliations
- Université de Montréal
- Ghent University
- University of South Bohemia
- Venue
- Zenodo
- Publisher
- Zenodo
- Published
- 2019-07-31
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
