Cited by 1

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

The PROV-K Ontology for tracking provenance of multi-sourced assertions

Menotti, Laura, MARCHESIN, STEFANO, Silvello, Gianmaria·2025·Zenodo

Abstract

This dataset was developed in the HEREDITARY project as a research prototype. It has not been assessed or certified under the EU Medical Device Regulation (EU) 2017/745. It must not be used to diagnose, treat, monitor or make any other decision about individual patients. The PROV-K ontology integrates the PROV Ontology (PROV-O) to represent provenance information of assertions derived from multiple sources using an aggregation algorithm. The PROV-K ontology represents conflicting and supporting evidence, the reliability of an assertion assigned by its creator or external agents, and trust relationships between agents or between an agent and an assertion. The complete documentation is available at: https://prov-k.dei.unipd.it/ontology/ . Contact for misuse or vulnerability reports. Laura Menotti, laura.menotti@unipd.it

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.5281/zenodo.15187371

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Menotti, L., MARCHESIN, S., & Silvello, G.
Affiliations
University of Padua
Venue
Zenodo
Publisher
Zenodo
Published
2025-04-10
References
0
Funders
European Commission (101137074)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review