The DOI matches its DataCite record.
CoreKB Trust Network
Abstract
This dataset was developed in the HEREDITARY project as a research prototype. It has not been assessed or certified under the EU Medical Device Regulation (EU) 2017/745. It must not be used to diagnose, treat, monitor or make any other decision about individual patients. Version 2: Fixed a typo in the name of the GPT agent. "gpt3oMini" -> "gpt4oMini". This repository contains an RDF graph representing the trust network of 45,649 reliable facts extracted by CoreKB. For each fact, the graph contains the reliability score assigned by its creator and the reliability scores assigned by four external agents, i.e., three LLMs and one crowd agent. In addition, the graph comprises trust relationships between the facts and the external agents. The graph is serialized following the PROV-K ontology (https://prov-k.dei.unipd.it/ontology/). Contact for misuse or vulnerability reports. Laura Menotti, laura.menotti@unipd.it
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The trust network graph is available in Zenodo and can be used for analytics and to assess the trustworthiness of each GCS, as evaluated by external agents not involved in its creation.
“This graph is available in Zenodo [16] and can be used for analytics and to assess the trustworthiness of each GCS, as evaluated by external agents not involved in its creation.”
From Provenance-driven nanopublications: representing source lineage and trust networks for multi-source assertions (2025) · cites this paper as [16]
The paper serialized an RDF graph representing the trust network of 45,649 reliable GCSs assessed by LLMs and published it in Zenodo [16].
“As a result, we serialize an RDF graph representing the trust network of the 45, 649 reliable GCSs assessed by LLMs and publish it in Zenodo [16].”
From Provenance-driven nanopublications: representing source lineage and trust networks for multi-source assertions (2025) · cites this paper as [16]
The trust network consisting of trust relationships between external agents and CoreKB facts enriched with trusted truth values is published in Zenodo [16].
“The trust network consisting of trust relationships between external agents and CoreKB facts enriched with trusted truth values is published in Zenodo [16].”
From Provenance-driven nanopublications: representing source lineage and trust networks for multi-source assertions (2025) · cites this paper as [16]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Menotti, L., Marchesin, S., Giachelle, F., & Silvello, G. (2025) · International Journal on Digital Libraries · doi:10.1007/s00799-025-00431-x · Cited by 5
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Menotti, L., MARCHESIN, S., Giachelle, F., & Silvello, G.
- Affiliations
- University of Padua
- Venue
- Zenodo
- Publisher
- Zenodo
- Published
- 2025-06-28
- References
- 0
- Funders
- European Commission (101137074)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
