SUSTAINABILITY STRATEGIES FOR INTERPROFESSIONAL EDUCATION: A SCOPE REVIEW
Open accessAbstract
Interprofessional Education (IPE) is an approach capable of improving the quality of health care, qualifying professionals and contributing to the training of undergraduate students. Despite the significant progress made in the last decade, integration, sustainability and institutional strengthening remain global priorities. In this sense, the continuity and strengthening of sustainability strategies are fundamental to the full development and consolidation of IPE. The aim of this study was to identify discussions on the sustainability of Interprofessional Education and map its actions or strategies. A Scoping Review was carried out, guided by the criteria of the Joanna Briggs Institute, and the writing of the report was guided by PRISMA-ScR. It went through six stages, namely: identification of the research question; identification of relevant studies; selection of studies; data extraction and coding; analysis and interpretation of the results; and presentation of the research findings. The following databases were used for data collection: LILACS, Embase, Scopus, MEDLINE, ERIC, Web of Science, CINAHL and gray literature. The data was analyzed using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis. A total of 57 studies were identified, mostly carried out in the years 2021 and 2022, with a predominance in the United States of America (27) and Brazil (8). The World Health Organization's definition of Interprofessional Education prevailed (18). With regard to sustainability strategies, at the Micro level, the following stood out: courses, training and continuous training in IPE for teachers, preceptors and facilitators; at the Meso level, the integration and/or standardization of curricula and components (courses, disciplines, extension activities, etc.); and at the Macro level, ministerial support and the creation of grants to promote IPE. The study highlighted the need for greater financial and political investment to strengthen and expand Interprofessional Education, because despite its development on a global scale, integration, sustainability and expansion still face significant barriers, with an impact on strengthening interprofessional work.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
- Authors
- OLIVEIRA, N. H. S. D., OLIVEIRA, R. F. S. D., SOARES, J. P., PADILHA, L. C., & CASTRO, J. L. D.
- Affiliations
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (BR)
- Universidade Federal de Roraima (BR)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Editora IOLE
- Publisher
- Editora IOLE
- Published
- 2025-07-31
- ISSN
- 2675-1488 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W6949449525
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Boletim de Conjuntura (BOCA)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
- Keywords
- interprofessional education, sustainability strategy, institutional capacity building, curriculum integration, health professions education, health policy support
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review