The DOI matches its DataCite record; its reference list is not available.
Original mineralogy of trilobite exoskeletons
Open accessAbstract
(Uploaded by Plazi from the Biodiversity Heritage Library) No abstract provided.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Class Trilobita are advanced arthropods with calcareous (low-magnesium calcite) carapaces.
“The Class Trilobita are advanced arthropods (Phylum Arthropoda) with calcareous (low-magnesium calcite) carapaces”
From Chronology of early Cambrian biomineralization (2012) · cites this paper as Wilmot & Fallick, 1989
Citations
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
Cited by 50
Metadata
- Authors
- Wilmot, N. V., & Fallick, A. E.
- ORCID
- Fallick, A E
- Venue
- Palaeontological Association
- Publisher
- Palaeontological Association
- Published
- 1989
- Volume
- 32
- Pages
- 297-304
- OpenAlex
- W2802855857
- Cited by
- 50
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2022: 8 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 2.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Biodiversity Heritage Library (Smithsonian Institution) (submittedVersion)
- Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
- Palaeontology
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Calcium Carbonate Crystallization and Inhibition
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
- Keywords
- trilobites, exoskeleton, mineralogy, chitinozoans
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review