Cited by 1

The DOI matches its DataCite record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pleistocene and Holocene Flora of New England as a Framework for Interpreting Aspects of Plant Rarity

Miller, N G·1989·New England Botanical Club [etc.]

Abstract

(Uploaded by Plazi from the Biodiversity Heritage Library) No abstract provided.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.5281/zenodo.16131214

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mosses associated with calcareous soil or bedrock predominate in the late-glacial record of New York-New England, even when the fossils were recovered from areas of acidic bedrock and soil.

    “Mosses associated with calcareous soil or bedrock predominate in the late-glacial record of New York-New England (Miller, 1987a(Miller, , b, 1989)), even when the fossils were recovered from areas of acidic bedrock and soil.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Miller, N. G.
Venue
New England Botanical Club [etc.]
Publisher
New England Botanical Club [etc.]
Published
1989
References
1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review