Cited by 1Artificial Intelligence in EducationEthics and Social Impacts of AIDigitalization, Law, and Regulation

The Operational Gap in Educational AI Governance: A Landscape Analysis of International Frameworks

Open access
Purdy, Ryan James·2025·Purdy House Institute

Abstract

The rapid deployment of artificial intelligence systems in educational settings has prompted significant policy development from international bodies, regional regulators, and national governments. This memorandum examines the current landscape of AI governance frameworks applicable to primary, secondary, and post-secondary education, identifying a consequential gap between policy articulation and institutional implementation. Through systematic analysis of frameworks from UNESCO, the OECD, UNICEF, the European Union, and various national jurisdictions, this paper establishes a four-category taxonomy: aspirational frameworks (which articulate principles), regulatory frameworks (which establish legal requirements), sector guidance (which provides education-specific recommendations), and operational frameworks (which supply implementation infrastructure). The analysis reveals that while the first three categories have proliferated, operational frameworks capable of translating policy into documented, auditable institutional practice remain largely absent from authoritative sources. This gap has significant implications for institutional compliance, insurance liability, and the protection of student welfare. The paper concludes that the education sector requires purpose-built operational infrastructure to bridge the distance between governance principles and demonstrable practice. SSRN working paper record will be added when available.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.5281/zenodo.18007386

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

Cited by 1

Authors
Purdy, R. J.
Affiliations
Purdy House Institute
Corresponding author
Purdy, Ryan James
Venue
Purdy House Institute
Publisher
Purdy House Institute
Published
2025-12-21
OpenAlex
W7116762754
Cited by
1
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
1.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
Keywords
AI governance in education, operational framework, policy implementation gap, artificial intelligence in education, UNICEF, European Union AI regulation, institutional compliance, insurance liabilities, student welfare

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review