A Controlled Corruption Dataset for Autonomous Driving (DRIVE-C)
Open accessAbstract
DRIVE-C is a controlled corruption dataset for autonomous driving research, designed to support studies of perception robustness, degradation awareness, and sensor health estimation. It uses real-world driving clips as inputs and applies 12 types of synthetic degradation at five severity levels. Some degradation methods use physics-inspired proxies. The dataset includes: 10 driving scenarios 610 video clips and 78,080 frames A configured, severity-derived Global Sensor Health Index reference (gshi_gt) and PerceptionHealthNet estimates (gshi_pred) DRIVE-C supports controlled evaluation of perception models under synthetic degradations. Version 1.1 corrects metadata and documentation and updates the PerceptionHealthNet baseline predictions used in the revised manuscript. The video frames and generated corruption variants are unchanged from Version 1.0. Scenario S07 is identified as a nighttime freeway scene. gshi_gt is derived from generator settings and declared taxonomy weights; it is not a physical sensor measurement or a measure of downstream safety or accuracy. gshi_pred contains model estimates and should be treated as baseline outputs, not validated health labels. DRIVE-C is a compact testbed, not a large-scale standardized benchmark or a substitute for automotive-grade sensor validation. Code and pipeline: https://github.com/shiv-aher/drive-c-dataset
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The DRIVE-C dataset is publicly available on Zenodo [6].
“The DRIVE-C dataset is publicly available on Zenodo [6].”
From DRIVE-C: A Controlled Corruption Dataset for Autonomous Driving (2026) · cites this paper as [6]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
DRIVE-C: A Controlled Corruption Dataset for Autonomous Driving
Aher, S. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.09774
Self-citation
- Authors
- Aher, S.
- Affiliations
- Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
- Corresponding author
- Aher, Shiva
- ORCID
- Aher, Shiva
- Venue
- Zenodo
- Publisher
- Zenodo
- Published
- 2026-10-24
- OpenAlex
- W7154966328
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- Type
- dataset
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Keywords
- autonomous driving, perception robustness, sensor degradation, data augmentation, DRIVE dataset
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review