Code for "The shrinking landscape of linguistic diversity in the age of large language models"
Open accessAbstract
Code release for "The shrinking landscape of linguistic diversity in the age of large language models" (Nature Human Behaviour, 2026)
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Emerging evidence shows measurable shifts in human writing styles, creative ideation, and divergent thinking following the widespread adoption of systems like ChatGPT.
“Emerging evidence shows measurable shifts in human writing styles, creative ideation, and divergent thinking following the widespread adoption of systems like ChatGPT [46, 6, 7, 24, 44, 79].”
From Artificial Hivemind: The Open-Ended Homogeneity of Language Models (and Beyond) (2025) · cites this paper as [79]
- Authors
- Sourati, Z.
- Affiliations
- University of Southern California (US)
- Corresponding author
- Sourati, Zhivar
- ORCID
- Sourati, Zhivar
- Venue
- Zenodo
- Publisher
- Zenodo
- Published
- 2026-07-27
- OpenAlex
- W7171454600
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- Type
- software
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- opensource.org/licenses/MIT
- Locations
- Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Linguistic and Sociocultural Studies
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Multilingual Education and Policy
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Keywords
- linguistic diversity, large language models, endangered languages, language shift, language vitality
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
