Cited by 1

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

Integrated Systems Framework for Commissioning Readiness Assessment in Offshore Processing Facilities Projects

Omoegun, Gbenga Olumide, Oduro, Melvin·2024·Zenodo

Abstract

Commissioning readiness in offshore processing facility projects is a critical determinant of operational reliability, safety, and performance assurance. This review explores the development of an integrated systems framework that synthesizes engineering, project management, and digital assurance methodologies for evaluating commissioning readiness across multidiscipline interfaces. The framework consolidates key dimensions—mechanical completion verification, system handover readiness, functional testing integrity, and dynamic performance validation—into a unified assessment model supported by data-driven analytics and digital twin technologies. The study evaluates current practices in commissioning planning, identifies prevalent deficiencies in subsystem integration, and proposes a structured approach for risk mitigation through enhanced information management and interface control. Emphasis is placed on aligning construction, pre-commissioning, and operations teams through automated progress tracking, functional hierarchy mapping, and readiness maturity indices. By integrating performance monitoring systems with predictive analytics, the proposed framework improves transparency and decision-making in late project phases. This review concludes that a systems-oriented approach to commissioning readiness can significantly reduce rework, cost overruns, and schedule delays, enabling offshore projects to achieve faster, safer, and more efficient start-up transitions within regulatory and quality compliance requirements.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.5281/zenodo.23870585

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Omoegun, G. O., & Oduro, M.
Venue
Zenodo
Publisher
Zenodo
Published
2024-04-05
References
0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review