The DOI matches its DataCite record.
Disrespect des Fonds: Rethinking Arrangement and Description in Born-Digital Archives
Abstract
This essay details the social and material conditions of the emergence of respect des fonds, the theory’s complex practical implementations and contested assumption, the emergence of alternate models, and how born-digital materials illuminate the theory’s analog origins and limitations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In archives, the principle of provenance developed in Europe in the 19th century so that archival repositories could arrange records in a way that reflected the organization of a collection as it was acquired, known as respect des fonds (Bailey 2013;Brilmyer 2022).”
From Can AI provenance inform archival provenance? (2026) · cites this paper as Bailey 2013
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Can AI provenance inform archival provenance?
Corry, F. (2026) · Cambridge Forum on AI: Culture and Society · doi:10.1017/cfc.2026.10025
Metadata
- Authors
- Bailey, J.
- ORCID
- Bailey, Jefferson
- Venue
- Zenodo
- Publisher
- Zenodo
- Published
- 2013-06-01
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Disrespect des Fonds: Rethinking Arrangement and Description in Born-Digital Archives. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5281/zenodo.3353360
- The paper
- Bailey, J. (2013). Disrespect des Fonds: Rethinking Arrangement and Description in Born-Digital Archives. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3353360
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
