Preliminary Results from the EntoGEM Project May 06, 2020
Open accessAbstract
This release of https://github.com/entogem/preliminary_results contains comparisons of the 10+-year studies identified by EntoGEM as of May 06, 2020 to the references included in 53 previous articles, commentaries, meta-analyses, and other syntheses mentioning "insect decline" in 2019 and 2020. It is not a definitive guide to studies that have been neglected by current debate surrounding insect decline, and is simply a checkpoint to verify that the community-driven approach to synthesis is helping identify studies that were previously not part of the conversation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Although only roughly 5% of the EntoGEM search results have been screened by the community so far, more than one hundred datasets containing 10 or more years of insect population and biodiversity data have already been identified that have not been referenced in any reviews, meta-analyses, or syntheses on insect decline to date.
“Although only roughly 5% of the EntoGEM search results have been screened by the community so far, already we have identified more than one hundred datasets that contain 10 or more years of insect population and biodiversity data that have not been referenced in any reviews, meta-analyses, or syntheses on insect decline to date (Grames, 2020).”
From Sysrev: A FAIR Platform for Data Curation and Systematic Evidence Review (2021) · cites this paper as Grames, 2020
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 1
- Authors
- Grames, E.
- Affiliations
- University of Connecticut (US)
- Corresponding author
- Grames, Eliza
- ORCID
- Grames, Eliza
- Venue
- Zenodo
- Publisher
- Zenodo
- Published
- 2020-05-07
- OpenAlex
- W4393460492
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2021: 1
- Type
- dataset
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- figshare.com
- Licence
- Locations
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Plant and animal studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Entomological Studies and Ecology
- Keywords
- insect decline, long-term insect monitoring, biodiversity loss, meta-analysis, insect population trends
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
