Cited by 63Indian and Buddhist StudiesCultural and Mythological StudiesStudy and Philosophy of Religion

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

The Śaiva Age: The Rise and Dominance of Śaivism during the Early Medieval Period

Open access
Sanderson, Alexis·2009·Zenodo

Abstract

Alexis Sanderson, "The Śaiva Age: The Rise and Dominance of Śaivism during the Early Medieval Period," in Genesis and Development of Tantrism, Institute of Oriental Culture Special Series, 23, edited by Shingo Einoo (Tokyo: Institute of Oriental Culture, University of Tokyo, 2009): 41-350. Tantrism -- History. Śaivism. Einoo, Shingo. Tōkyō Daigaku. Tōyō Bunka Kenkyūjo.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.5281/zenodo.4395628

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Sanderson, A.
Corresponding author
Sanderson, Alexis
Venue
Zenodo
Publisher
Zenodo
Published
2009-12-28
Pages
41-349
OpenAlex
W2605617138
Cited by
63
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
FWCI
35.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › General Arts and Humanities › Cultural and Mythological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
Keywords
Shaivism, Tantra, early medieval India, Hinduism, Indian religious history

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review