Cited by 14Speech Recognition and SynthesisMusic and Audio ProcessingDigital Media Forensic Detection

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

WaveFake: A data set to facilitate audio DeepFake detection

Open access
Frank, Joel, Schönherr, Lea·2021·Zenodo

Abstract

The main purpose of this data set is to facilitate research into audio DeepFakes. These generated media files have been increasingly used to commit impersonation attempts or online harassment. The data set consists of 88,600 generated audio clips (16-bit PCM wav). All of these samples were generated by four different neural network architectures: MelGAN Parallel WaveGAN Multi-Band MelGAN WaveGlow Additionally, we examined a bigger version of MelGAN and investigated a variant of Multi-Band MelGAN that computes its auxiliary loss over the full audio instead of its subbands. Collection Process For WaveGlow, we utilize the official implementation (commit 8afb643) in conjunction with the official pre-trained network on PyTorch Hub. We use a popular implementation available on GitHub (commit 12c677e) for the remaining networks. The repository also offers pre-trained models. We used the pre-trained networks to generate samples that are similar to their respective training distributions, LJ Speech and JSUT. When sampling the data set, we first extract Mel spectrograms from the original audio files, using the pre-processing scripts of the corresponding repositories. We then feed these Mel spectrograms to the respective models to obtain the data set. This data set is licensed with a CC-BY-SA 4.0 license. This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) under Germany's Excellence Strategy -- EXC-2092 CaSa -- 390781972.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.5281/zenodo.4904579

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Frank, J., & Schönherr, L.
Affiliations
Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
Venue
Zenodo
Publisher
Zenodo
Published
2021-06-08
OpenAlex
W4393707478
Cited by
10
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
Type
dataset
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Music and Audio Processing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
Keywords
deepfake audio, audio deepfake detection, synthetic audio, text-to-speech, speech synthesis, WaveGAN, HiFi-GAN, WaveGlow, LJSpeech, conformational isomers, audio forensics, impersonation, online harassment, Mel spectrogram, audio watermarking, audio fingerprinting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review