Cited by 242Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic VariationLinguistic Studies and Language AcquisitionLinguistics and Discourse Analysis

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

The meaning of focus particles: A comparative perspective

Open access
König, Ekkehard·1991·Zenodo

Abstract

This book describes the meaning of focus particles such as 'only' and 'also' in a range of European languages.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.5281/zenodo.5854913

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
König, E.
Affiliations
Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
Corresponding author
König, Ekkehard
Venue
Zenodo
Publisher
Zenodo
Published
1991-01-01
OpenAlex
W4301123241
Cited by
242
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
5.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • OLAC - Open Language Archives Community (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Linguistic Studies and Language Acquisition
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Linguistics and Discourse Analysis
Keywords
focus particles, only, also, comparative linguistics, European languages, contrastive syntax

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review