Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

DEATH OF THE AUTHOR: A SURVEY ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN LITERATURE

Open access
AYDOĞDU ÇELİK, Merve·2023·Zenodo

Abstract

Artificial intelligence technology, which is an important landmark in computer science, is a field of study which focuses on forming smart machines performing tasks that naturally necessitate human intelligence. AI, which models and mimics the human behaviour such as reasoning, learning, and planning as well as the tools humans handle, has been widely used in several fields of expertise such as economy, finance, education, agriculture, and healthcare. Coupled with deep learning, artificial intelligence turns out to be one of the most significant technological advancements of the 21st century as it pioneers the digital transformation of the modern society. As AI is drastically scientific and basically a preoccupation with numbers, literature, which is laden with figures of speech, has been regarded as the one and only branch that it can never master. The latest developments on computational literature indicate the opposite, though. Since the second half of the 20th century, there have been poems and novels written by AI. In this context, the aim of this study is to illustrate how artificial intelligence creates literary works based on the examples created using the online AI software programme – OpenAI. Within this framework, the study concludes that artificial intelligence technology has become prominent also in the literary field and that the death of the author might be sooner than it is actually expected.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.5281/zenodo.7853092

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

See all 4

Metadata

Authors
AYDOĞDU ÇELİK, M.
Venue
Zenodo
Publisher
Zenodo
Published
2023-04-21
OpenAlex
W4366574195
Cited by
3
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 3
FWCI
2.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • DergiPark (Istanbul University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Law › Literary and Philosophical Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Art, Technology, and Culture
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Digital Humanities and Scholarship
Keywords
artificial intelligence in literature, AI-generated literature, death of the author, OpenAI, machine-generated poetry, authorship, deep learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: DEATH OF THE AUTHOR: A SURVEY ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN LITERATURE. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5281/zenodo.7853092
The paper
AYDOĞDU ÇELİK, M. (2023). DEATH OF THE AUTHOR: A SURVEY ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN LITERATURE. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7853092

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.