THE IMPACT OF CHAT GPT ON STUDENT'S WRITING SKILLS: AN EXPLORATION OF AI-ASSISTED WRITING TOOLS
Open accessAbstract
This article explores the ways in which Chat GPT, an AI-assisted writing tool, can impact student's writing skills. Chat GPT can assist students with generating writing prompts, providing feedback and revision suggestions, and offering writing assistance. The article discusses the benefits and potential drawbacks of using Chat GPT for improving student's writing skills, as well as provides examples of how this technology is being used in education. These examples include the University of Michigan's AI writing tutor M-Write and AI-powered writing assistants like Grammarly and Hemingway Editor. While Chat GPT has the potential to transform the way we teach writing, further research is needed to evaluate the effectiveness of this technology in improving student's writing skills.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
AI-assisted language learning tools improve various facets of writing skills and engagement among English language learners.
“The existing literature review underscores the substantial impact of AI-assisted language learning tools on improving various facets of writing skills and engagement among English language learners (Nazari et al., 2021; Abdullayeva and Musayeva, 2023; Su et al., 2023; Utami and Winarni, 2023; Yan, 2023).”
From Enhancing academic writing skills and motivation: assessing the efficacy of ChatGPT in AI-assisted language learning for EFL students (2023) · cites this paper as Abdullayeva and Musayeva, 2023
The introduction (p. 62) says ChatGPT can help students improve their writing through prompts, feedback, and suggestions about style; the “Writing prompts” section also describes engaging prompts. But the paper discusses potential benefits for students generally, not demonstrated improvements in writing and engagement specifically among English language learners. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Song, C., & Song, Y. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1260843 · Cited by 717 · see citing works
Wang, H., Dang, A., Wu, Z., & Mac, S. (2024) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100326 · Cited by 272 · see citing works
Mohammadkarimi, E. (2023) · Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching · doi:10.37074/jalt.2023.6.2.10 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Zou, B., Wang, C., He, H., Li, C., Purwanto, E., & Wang, P. (2025) · Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/j.lmot.2025.102158 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
- Authors
- Abdullayeva, M., & Muzaffarovna, M. Z.
- ORCID
- Abdullayeva, Madina
- Venue
- Zenodo
- Publisher
- Zenodo
- Published
- 2023-04-28
- OpenAlex
- W4367399085
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 11
- FWCI
- 7.72
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Writing and Handwriting Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Keywords
- ChatGPT, AI writing tools, student writing ability, writing instruction, writing prompts, automated feedback, writing revision, Grammarly, generative AI in education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
