The DOI matches its DataCite record.
Role of Social Media in Teaching – Learning Process
Open accessAbstract
Abstract : Social media are becoming the most important tools for interaction among people, where everybody can share, exchange, comment, discuss and create information and knowledge in a collaborative way. Social media tools are rapidly changing the communications landscape, their emergence has impacted significantly how students learn and the way instructors teach. In today higher education settings, instructors, students and others collaborate on the tasks of knowledge construction.The definition of social media is “the relationships that exist between network of people” The influence of social media on teaching and learning environment is growing every year and its applications can reinforce class materials, positively influenced discussions, collaborative work, etc. The educators and researchers experimenting the social media technologies to stimulate collaboration, knowledge constructions and thinking skills. The increasingly widespread use of social network sites to expand and deepen one’s social connections is a relatively new but potentially important phenomenon that has implications for teaching and learning and teacher education in the 21st century.The main aim of the paper is to find the gap of knowledge in adoption of social network sites in teaching and learning process in formal sites that can efficiency applied in educational system and provides direction for subsequences researches and as a guideline for future research in social network sites in education. IndexTerms - Social Networking Sites, Social Media, Pedagogy, ICTs
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Social media can be regarded as a network that represents the relationships among people (Devi et al., 2019).”
From Social Media in Education: A Case Study Regarding Higher Education Students' Viewpoints (2022) · cites this paper as Devi et al., 2019
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Research works printed but not linked: 25
- Boyd, d. m., & Ellison, N. B. 2007. Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), article 11. Retrieved October 9, 2008, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/boyd.ellison.html.
- Crook, C. 2012. The 'digital native' in context: tensions associated with importing Web 2.0 practices into the school setting. Oxford Review of Education 38 (1), 63-80.
- Ellison, N. B. & Boyd, d. 2013. Sociality through SNS. In Dutton, W. H. (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Internet Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 151-172.
- Greenhow, C. 2006. From blackboard to browser: An examination of teachers' constructivist beliefs and practice in using the internet (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Harvard University: Cambridge, MA.
- Greenhow, C. 2011a. Online social networks and learning. On the Horizon, 19(1), 4-12.
- Greenhow, C. &Robelia, E. 2009. Old communication, new literacies: Social network sites as social learning resources. Journal of Computer-mediated Communication, 14, 1130-1161.
- Halverson, E. R. 2011. Do social networking technologies have a place in formal learning environments? On the Horizon, 19(1), 62-67.
- Manca, S. &Ranieri, M. 2013. Is it a tool suitable for learning? A critical review of the literature on Facebook as a technology-enhanced learning environment. Journal of ComputerAssisted Learning, 29(6), 487-504.
- Selwyn, N. 2010. Looking beyond learning: Notes towards the critical study of educational technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(1), 65-73.
- Siemens, G. 2005. Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning 2(10), 3-10.
- Siemens, G., & Weller, M. 2011. Higher education and the promises and perils of social network. Revista de Universidad y Sociedad del Conocimiento (RUSC), 8(1), 164-170.
- Ferdig, R. E. 2007. Editorial: Examining social software in teacher. Journal of Technology & Teacher Education, 15(1), 5- 10.
- Teclehaimanot, B., & Hickman, T. 2011. Student-teacher interaction of Facebook: What students find appropriate. TechTrends, 55(3), 19-30.
- Brady, K. P., Holcomb, L. B., & Smith, B. V. 2010. The use of alternative social networking sites in higher educational settings: A case study of the e-learning benefits of Ning in education. Journal of Interactive Online Learning,9 (2), 151-170.
- Madhusudan G. Tandale, and Dr. Raghu Raman. 2016. 'Social Media in Teaching and Learning -A Study'. International Journal of Education & Applied Sciences, Reseach. Vol.3. Issue 06. Pp 31-42.
- Brydolf, C. 2007. "Minding MySpace: Balancing the benefits and risks of students' online social networks", Education Digest, 73(2), 4.
- D. M. Boyd and N. B. Ellison 2007. "Social network sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship", Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, Vol. 13, pp. 210-230.
- Kalpidou, M., Costin, D., & Morris, J. 2011. "The relationship between Facebook and the well-being of undergraduate college students", Cyberpsychology, Behavior & Social Networking, 14 (4), 183-189. doi:10.1089/cyber.2010.0061. · DOI · Paper page
- M. A. Urista, Q. Dong, and K. D. Day. 2009. "Explaining why young adults use myspace and Facebook through the uses and gratifications theory", Human Communication, Vol.12, No.2, pp. 215-229.
- Mike Moron, Jeff Seaman, Hester Tinti-Kane. 2011. "Teaching, Learning, and Sharing: How Today"s Higher Education Faculty Use Social Media", Pearson Learning Solutions.and Babson Survey Research Group, Boston, MA.
- Silius, K., Tervakari, A.M., &Miilumäki, T. 2009. "Learning by doing as mobile with a Urban Computing Lab", Proceedings of International Technology Enhanced Learning Conference 2009, TELearn 2009. October 2009, Taipei, Taiwan.http://matriisi.ee.tut.fi/hypermedia//julkaisut/2009-silius-etal-learningbydoing-ucl.pdf.
- Wheeler, S., Yeomans, P., & Wheeler, D. 2008. "The good, the bad and the wiki: Evaluating student-generated content for collaborative learning", British Journal of Educational Technology, Vol.39, No.6, pp.987-995.
- Liccardi, I.; Ounnas, A.; Pau, R.; Massey, E.; Kinnunen, P.; Lewthwaite, S.; Midy, M.-A.; Sarkar, C. 2007. The Role of Social Networks in Students' Learning Experiences. In 'ITiCSE-WGR '07; Working Group Reports on ITiCSE on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education; ACM: New York, NY, USA; pp. 224-237.
- Diaz, P., KinshukAedo, I., Mora, E., Eds. 2008. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies. IEEE Computer Society. Copyright Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Santander, Spain, 1- 5 July; pp. 529-533.
- Lave, J.; Wenger, E. 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.
Cited by
Social Media in Education: A Case Study Regarding Higher Education Students' Viewpoints
Lampropoulos, G., Makkonen, P., & Siakas, K. (2022) · Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-93904-5_73 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Devi, K. S., Lakshmi, V. V., & E.Gouthami
- Affiliations
- G.Narayanamma Institute of Technology & Science (for Women) Shaikpet, Hyderabad - 104
- Venue
- Zenodo
- Publisher
- Zenodo
- Published
- 2019-01-15
- OpenAlex
- W4381032253
- Cited by
- 53
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 11.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- zenodo.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Technology in Learning
- Social Sciences › Education › Education and Digital Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology and E-Learning
- Keywords
- social media in education, social networking sites, teaching-learning process, cooperative learning, knowledge construction, teacher professional development, ICT in education, higher education, pedagogy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
