Cited by 1Online and Blended LearningEnglish Language Learning and TeachingForeign Language Teaching Methods

Question -Response in Online Synchronous Videoconferencing Class

Open access
Chaqmaqchee, Obaida, Paramasivam, Shamala·2021·International Journal of Linguistics

Abstract

With recent developments in technology and its massive impact on the education field, videoconferencing has emerged as an effective teaching learning tool in the language classroom. It is mainly a means of communication to overcome the impediments of geographical distance and separation. However, despite the successful implementation of this technology, it has been stated that using videoconferencing for online teaching is problematic. Videoconferencing impedes instructor-learner interaction and is unable to replace the traditional face-to-face classroom. To understand online interaction from a sociocultural standpoint, this study examined the characteristics of instructor questions in terms of cognitive level so as to investigate if instructor question can function as a stimulus for interaction in the online classroom. The results show that cognitive level of instructor question can function as an effective factor to promote online classroom interaction. Conclusions and implications are drawn at the end of this paper to help understand interaction in online learning.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5296/ijl.v13i6.19133

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The nuanced interpretation of evaluative language in online language using the Appraisal framework remains underexplored in linguistic scholarship.

    “Despite the growing prevalence of digital discourse in everyday life, the nuanced interpretation of evaluative language remains underexplored in linguistic scholarship.”

    From EXPLORING PUBLIC EVALUATION THROUGH APPRAISAL FRAMEWORK: A STUDY ON LEVI’S ADVERTISEMENT FEATURING BEYONCE (2025) · cites this paper as Chaqmaqchee & Paramasivam, 2021

    Section 1.1 discusses how online language-classroom interaction has been assessed, while the Concluding Remarks address instructor questions and students’ oral production. Neither section addresses evaluative language, the Appraisal framework, or whether its interpretation is underexplored in linguistic scholarship; searches for those terms and related phrasing found no supporting passage. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Banna, J., Grace Lin, M.-F., Stewart, M., & Fialkowski, M. K. (2015). Interaction matters: Strategies to promote engaged learning in an online introductory nutrition course. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 11(2), 249-261. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27441032%0Ahttp://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/artic lerender.fcgi?artid=PMC4948751
  2. Bernstein, S. P. (2013). A distance education classroom designed to facilitate synchronous learner and instructor interactions (Doctoral dissertation). University of Nebraska, Lincoln, USA.
  3. Blanchette, J. (2001). Questions in the online learning environment. Journal of Distance Education, 16(2), 37-57.
  4. Bygate, M., Skehan, P., & Swain, M. (2001). Researching Pedagogic Tasks: Second Language Learning, Teaching, and Testing. In Routledge (Vol. 4).
  5. Debra Myhill, Susan Jones and Rosemary Hopper. British Journal of Educational Studies, 56(1), 103-105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8527.2008.00397_4.x · DOI
  6. Goossen, L. H. (2002). Classroom questioning strategies as indicators of inquiry-based science instruction (Doctoral dissertation). Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, Michigan.
  7. Greene, J. C. (2003). Handbook of communication and social interaction skills. Psychology Press.
  8. Levin, J., & Nolan, J. F. (2004). Principles of classroom management: A professional decision making model (4th ed.). New York, NY:Allyn & Bacon.
  9. Lindenmeyer, S. (1990). Study of referential and display questions and their responses in adult ESL reading classes. Dissertations and Theses. Paper 4070. https://doi.org/10.15760/etd.5954 · DOI
  10. Newcomb L. R., & Trefz, M. K. (1987, February). Levels of Cognition of Student Tests and Assignments in The College of Agriculture at The Ohio State University. Proceedings of The Central Region 41st Annual Research Conference in Agricultural Education, Qiicago, 1L.
  11. Qashoa, S. (2013). Effects of teacher question types and syntactic structures on EFL classroom interaction. The International Journal of Social Sciences, 7(1), 52-62.
  12. Shantha, S., & Mekala, S. (2018). The Impact of Pedagogical Intervention in Developing the Speaking Proficiency of Engineering Students. Social Sciences & Humanities, 26(2), 735-750.
  13. Shomoossi, N. (2004). The effects of Teachers' Questioning Behaviour on EFL Classroom Interaction: A Classroom Reseacrh Study. The Reading Matrix, 4(2), 96-104.
  14. Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. M. Gass, & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235-253).
  15. Terras, K. L. (2017). Transforming the Teacher: Examining Personal Transformations of Faculty Redesigning Courses from Face-to-Face to Online. Journal of Transformative Learning, 1(4), 33-49.
  16. Vuleta, K., & Martinović, A. (2019). Teacher questions in EFL classrooms. Metodički ogledi: časopis za filozofiju odgoja, 26(1), 149-175.
  17. Yang, C. C. R. (2010). Teacher Questions in Second Language Classrooms: An Investigation of Three Case Studies. Asian EFL Journal, 12(1).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chaqmaqchee, O., & Paramasivam, S.
Affiliations
Universiti Putra Malaysia (MY)
Venue
International Journal of Linguistics
Published
2021-12-07
Volume
13
Issue
6
Pages
1
ISSN
1948-5425 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4200142708
Cited by
1
References
52
Citations by year
2025: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
International Journal of Linguistics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › English Language Learning and Teaching
  • Social Sciences › Education › Foreign Language Teaching Methods
Keywords
online classroom interaction, cognitive level of questions, language classroom, distance education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review