Cited by 32Social Policy and Reform StudiesSocial Capital and NetworksCulture, Economy, and Development Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Puzzle of the Scandinavian Welfare State and Social Trust

Open access
Svendsen, Gunnar Lind Haase, Svendsen, Gert Tinggaard·2015·Issues in Social Science

Abstract

The Scandinavian welfare model is a puzzle to economists: It works economically, even though free-riding should prevail with its explosive cocktail of high taxation and high social benefits. One possible solution to the puzzle could be the unique stock of social trust present in Scandinavia. Here, the four Scandinavian countries (Norway, Denmark, Sweden, and Finland) form the top three with scores above 60 percent social trust on a ranking that covers 94 countries from all over the world.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5296/iss.v3i2.8597

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Bjørnskov, C. (2009). Economic growth. In G. T. Svendsen, & G. L. H. Svendsen (Eds.), Handbook of Social Capital: The Troika of Sociology, Political Science and Economics (pp. 337-353). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
  2. Offe, C. (1999). Trust and knowledge, rules and decisions: Exploring a difficult conceptual terrain. In M. Warren (Ed.), Democracy and Trust. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  3. Smith, A. (1976 [1776]). The Wealth of Nations. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (Vols. 1-2). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  4. Svendsen, G. T. (2014). Trust. (Reflections). Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus University Press.
  5. Svendsen, G. L. H., & Svendsen, G. T. (2016). Social Capital and the Scandinavian Welfare State: Explaining the Flight of the Bumblebee. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. In press.

Metadata

Authors
Svendsen, G. L. H., & Svendsen, G. T.
Affiliations
University of Southern Denmark (DK)
Venue
Issues in Social Science
Published
2015-11-20
Volume
3
Issue
2
Pages
90
ISSN
2329-521X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1761824513
Cited by
32
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1
FWCI
15.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Issues in Social Science (publishedVersion)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Social Policy and Reform Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Capital and Networks
  • Social Sciences › Development › Culture, Economy, and Development Studies
Keywords
Nordic welfare states, social trust, free-riding, taxation, social benefits, welfare state sustainability, cross-national comparison

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review